I'm looking at upgrading the track on my 06 switchback 600HO to a 2" x144. I'm looking for any opinions which is a better 2",the camoplast challenger or the Polaris series 4? Are there any others I should also consider.
challenger vs polaris series 4
- Thread starter Creek Chub
- Start date
I loved my challenger in the steep n deep, this year I upgraded to a 16 wide on my RMK. It is a little tight but hooks up friggin hard. I don't think I would even mess around with another 15 wide. The series 4 isn't bad, but I think the challenger is a much better choice. If you are just riding in deep stuff I would go with a 16 wide challenger. hope this helps.
I prefered my series III track over my series IV and like my brothers challenger better than the series IV in the snow we ride in.
IMO the series 4 is a better pow track than the challenger but if there is any consistancy or hard base in the snow the challenger will outshine it. I prefer the series 4 for the type of riding I like to do. I am a tree picker.
G
Gone Sleddin
Active member
i prefer the series 4. had a 156 challenger on my 700 rmk and it was a pretty good track in the powder but i had torn lugs after my 2nd trip to the mountains and the series 4 seems to plane up on the snow better where the challenger seemed to dig down for traction. i dont think you will be disaponted with either
Similar threads
