Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was wondering if anyone could post a picture of their air box and tell how it performed with respect to even egt temps. My boondocker pg turbo air box brings the charge tube in at an angle from the top and directs more air mass to the pto cylinder causing the mag side to run very rich which makes tuning difficult. I don't like the idea of having to pull fuel from the mag side all the time so I will be welding up a new air box that induces a laminar flow. This should reduce the loss of kinetic energy of the air flow increasing turbine efficiency.
Will I notice an increase in lag from another two feet of charge tube length? I would like to run the charge tube in from the front more similar to the stock intake setup.
Has anyone else noticed lower egt temps on the mag side? Or noticed the mag side being the first to foul out when running to rich?
At first I thought the different temperatures were a sled issue. But after exchanging every component on the sled including the engine, swapping injectors, EVERYTHING, I reduced the issue to the air box. The sled runs dead nuts even egts +/- 10 degrees in the stock configuration. I would like to see some other turbo kit intake designs for some ideas. Or if anyone can recommend a good intake I might just buy one and save myself the time of welding one up. Nobody seems to show pictures of the components in their turbo kits.
Is this the tube thing air box your talking about?
. I ended up installing my power commander 5 box on top of the bd Turbo box. I leaned out the problem cylinder with pcv and it just switched to fouling the other cylinder. That seems to disprove my bad air box theory. I have had this Turbo on two different 09 m1000 sleds and both had the same issue. It bogs bad and won't go above 6300 rpm Very easily. However when you kill it and start it again, for the first grab on the throttle it has no hesitation or bog whatsoever. Totally confused. Tried playing with every fuel setting fat and lean and here was my best numbers.
3000 0 0 0
4500 ~3, ~7, 0
Psi 0 3 25
0~3000ft
PG Turbo 09 m1000
Like most content on snowest, this thread topic is bad information in respect to simple eng design and theories.
To suggest a side inlet supply airbox flows more air to one cylinder vs the other is silly in my mind. Lets keep it simple bros, the void inbetween the turbo compressor wheel and each cylinder is pressured up to whatever boost level you're running, thus its all more less equal velocity/flow/mass etc etc etc...seriously, its not a rocket ship, just a simple 2 smoke eng with $5 of OEM instamentation and control with a simple turbo kit.