Care to explain? Trouble, like places you shouldn't or couldn't have gone w/a smaller track? With regards to your friend, I figured the longer track would inspire more confidence. Was it a different chassis that handled different?
I'm glad to see there's some big guys out there that like to ride too! Maybe it doesn't matter that much, but I can't help but think me and my gear need more track on the ground than someone who's 5-6 and 130.
I really like the idea of the 163, but I'm afraid last seasons huge snow is going to make me think I need it when maybe I don't and then I'll regret it later on in the "normal" snow years.
Do you have to lean it over or throw your weight around more w/longer sleds? Everyone says my GenII is the worst handling sled out there, it can't be worse than that can it?
Well, the guy never even used his old sled to it's full potential, and when he upgraded, his skills never improved.
To explain, lets see. There is some set up spring snow, and the sled gets really pushy and no ski will help/. You go down into a steeper valley and there is no flat spot on the bottom to turn around and a creek or trees are there.. You know when you get sucked into trees, same thing.
To go from pointing downward, and whipping the sled around (Make it or die) and shooting back up, can make trouble if you have low confidence... well a 162 does not dig like a 151 to get yourself spun around.
If you just stay on the open plains, and just tour... sure a super long track is great... you won't get stuck as bad, and in somewhat soft snow, that chews out, it is ok.