face to every honest citizen,veteran,democrat, republican,no matter what nationality they are by vomit obamit who announced making illegals (who are criminals)reg citizens. now is the time to make your voice heard contact your elected officials write your newspapers.if this is done its crazy the message we send is that our laws have no back bone, if your a criminal or terrorist you will get away with what you've done and be rewarded pampered and possibly sent to the bahamas
a punch in the
- Thread starter m7bandit
- Start date
Nothing wrong with being American, Or is there?
I feel you pain
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522659,00.html
I feel you pain
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522659,00.html
While your venting to your local congressman be sure and bring up this issue that would allow government contractors to hire illegal aliens on government jobs. If your unemployed they are going to get the jobs you deserve. Be sure and contact the clowns listed below even if their not your rep, they will respond to massive contacts. Swampy
The choice couldn't have been clearer. And these U.S. Representatives said a big fat NO to the unemployed voters of their Congressional Districts and said hundreds of federal contractor jobs have to remain with illegal aliens. See the list of shame below.
On Friday, the U.S. Representatives listed below took an amazingly callous action that told federal contractors that they can continue to use taxpayer money to hire illegal aliens -- instead of unemployed Americans.
They voted NO on an amendment to let Americans have those jobs.
I hope you will broadcast the shame of their vote throughout the voters of their Districts.
This is the latest of a growing and nauseatingly long list of actions this year in which the majority in Congress take the side of Big Business and illegal aliens against the U.S. households that would like nothing better than to get a paycheck again.
These Representatives took this unconscionable action because they don't believe the voters in their district will notice or create any political pain. ONLY YOU CAN CHANGE THAT PERCEPTION. Please spread the word among everybody you know that these Representatives are taking these kinds of actions.
This outrageous vote today was not an oversight. No, they knew exactly what they were doing and they were doing what their Party leadership told them to do.
The debate in the Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives was very clear about what was at stake. Because Congress and the President have refused repeatedly during this deep recession to bar illegal aliens from federal jobs, Rep. Kingston of Georgia once again on Friday offered an amendment to make sure that federal contractors employ only legal workers.
For the most part, federal contractors are the only part of our economy that is growing. This is where the jobs are. We and our children and grandchildren will be paying off the debt for these Stimulus jobs and deficit spending for decades. Rep. Kingston fought for a small sense of decency, asking that Americans and legal immigrants already here get those jobs. It appears that hundreds of thousands of these jobs already are filled by illegal aliens.
If Kingston's amendment had passed, federal contractors would have had to run their existing and new employees through E-Verify which would have forced the illegal workers out, opening up jobs for hundreds of thousands of unemployed Americans and legal immigrants.
BUT THESE REPRESENTATIVES VOTED 'NO' -- REFUSING TO MAKE FEDERAL CONTRACTORS USE E-VERIFY TO KEEP ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT OF JOBS
(AZ) Ed Pastor
(AR) Marion Berry
(CA) Sam Farr
(CA) Michael Honda
(CA) Barbara Lee
(CA) Lucille Roybal-Allard
(CA) Adam Schiff
(CO) John Salazar
(CT) Rosa DeLauro
(FL) Allen Boyd
(FL) Debbie Wasserman Schultz
(GA) Sanford Bishop
(IL) Jesse Jackson
(IN) Peter Visclosky
(KY) Ben Chandler
(MA) John Oliver
(MI) Carolyn Kilpatrick
(MN) Betty McCollum (NJ) Steven Rothman
(NY) Maurice Hinchey
(NY) Steve Israel
(NY) Nita Lowey
(NY) Jose Serrano
(NC) David Price
(OH) Marcy Kaptur
(OH) Tim Ryan
(PA) Chaka Fattah
(PA) John Murtha
(TN) Lincoln Davis
(TX) Chet Edwards
(TX) Ciro Rodriguez
(VA) Jim Moran
(WA) Norman Dicks
(WV) Alan Mollohan
(WI) David Obey
Why did these elected officials vote against giving federal contractor jobs to American workers?
Spokesmen for the NO vote tried to use the Chamber of Commerce's tired but totally false line that DHS is unprepared to handle such a large increase in E-Verifiy users, and that the error rate is too high.
In fact, even DHS head Janet Napolitano recently said that DHS can handle the expansion easily. And the E-Verify error rate is quickly approaching zero, with safeguards protecting every innocent party from losing even a day's work and wages.
So what is the real reason 35 Representatives killed the hopes of hundreds of thousands of unemployed Americans that they could get a federal contractor job this summer?
One of two reasons:
1. They are committed to protecting the job of every illegal alien until Congress can pass an amnesty that will give permanent job permits to the illegal workers. Some of the NO spokesmen today said that these questions about E-Verify should wait until Congress is considering the comprehensive (amnesty) bill.
2. They feel more beholden to Party leaders in the House than to the jobless households in their Districts. Party loyalty seemed to be the driving principle today.
Either way, those of you represented by these NO voters have a big problem on your hands.
The rest of us are depending on you change some minds.
The choice couldn't have been clearer. And these U.S. Representatives said a big fat NO to the unemployed voters of their Congressional Districts and said hundreds of federal contractor jobs have to remain with illegal aliens. See the list of shame below.
On Friday, the U.S. Representatives listed below took an amazingly callous action that told federal contractors that they can continue to use taxpayer money to hire illegal aliens -- instead of unemployed Americans.
They voted NO on an amendment to let Americans have those jobs.
I hope you will broadcast the shame of their vote throughout the voters of their Districts.
This is the latest of a growing and nauseatingly long list of actions this year in which the majority in Congress take the side of Big Business and illegal aliens against the U.S. households that would like nothing better than to get a paycheck again.
These Representatives took this unconscionable action because they don't believe the voters in their district will notice or create any political pain. ONLY YOU CAN CHANGE THAT PERCEPTION. Please spread the word among everybody you know that these Representatives are taking these kinds of actions.
This outrageous vote today was not an oversight. No, they knew exactly what they were doing and they were doing what their Party leadership told them to do.
The debate in the Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives was very clear about what was at stake. Because Congress and the President have refused repeatedly during this deep recession to bar illegal aliens from federal jobs, Rep. Kingston of Georgia once again on Friday offered an amendment to make sure that federal contractors employ only legal workers.
For the most part, federal contractors are the only part of our economy that is growing. This is where the jobs are. We and our children and grandchildren will be paying off the debt for these Stimulus jobs and deficit spending for decades. Rep. Kingston fought for a small sense of decency, asking that Americans and legal immigrants already here get those jobs. It appears that hundreds of thousands of these jobs already are filled by illegal aliens.
If Kingston's amendment had passed, federal contractors would have had to run their existing and new employees through E-Verify which would have forced the illegal workers out, opening up jobs for hundreds of thousands of unemployed Americans and legal immigrants.
BUT THESE REPRESENTATIVES VOTED 'NO' -- REFUSING TO MAKE FEDERAL CONTRACTORS USE E-VERIFY TO KEEP ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT OF JOBS
(AZ) Ed Pastor
(AR) Marion Berry
(CA) Sam Farr
(CA) Michael Honda
(CA) Barbara Lee
(CA) Lucille Roybal-Allard
(CA) Adam Schiff
(CO) John Salazar
(CT) Rosa DeLauro
(FL) Allen Boyd
(FL) Debbie Wasserman Schultz
(GA) Sanford Bishop
(IL) Jesse Jackson
(IN) Peter Visclosky
(KY) Ben Chandler
(MA) John Oliver
(MI) Carolyn Kilpatrick
(MN) Betty McCollum (NJ) Steven Rothman
(NY) Maurice Hinchey
(NY) Steve Israel
(NY) Nita Lowey
(NY) Jose Serrano
(NC) David Price
(OH) Marcy Kaptur
(OH) Tim Ryan
(PA) Chaka Fattah
(PA) John Murtha
(TN) Lincoln Davis
(TX) Chet Edwards
(TX) Ciro Rodriguez
(VA) Jim Moran
(WA) Norman Dicks
(WV) Alan Mollohan
(WI) David Obey
Why did these elected officials vote against giving federal contractor jobs to American workers?
Spokesmen for the NO vote tried to use the Chamber of Commerce's tired but totally false line that DHS is unprepared to handle such a large increase in E-Verifiy users, and that the error rate is too high.
In fact, even DHS head Janet Napolitano recently said that DHS can handle the expansion easily. And the E-Verify error rate is quickly approaching zero, with safeguards protecting every innocent party from losing even a day's work and wages.
So what is the real reason 35 Representatives killed the hopes of hundreds of thousands of unemployed Americans that they could get a federal contractor job this summer?
One of two reasons:
1. They are committed to protecting the job of every illegal alien until Congress can pass an amnesty that will give permanent job permits to the illegal workers. Some of the NO spokesmen today said that these questions about E-Verify should wait until Congress is considering the comprehensive (amnesty) bill.
2. They feel more beholden to Party leaders in the House than to the jobless households in their Districts. Party loyalty seemed to be the driving principle today.
Either way, those of you represented by these NO voters have a big problem on your hands.
The rest of us are depending on you change some minds.
By HENRY J. PULIZZI
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama said Friday that he wants to push comprehensive immigration reform through Congress before he leaves office, but he didn't elaborate on a timeframe for the politically thorny endeavor.
"I'm committed to passing comprehensive immigration reform as president of the United States," Mr. Obama said at the Esperanza National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast in Washington. "The American people believe in immigration."
The reform effort, which went nowhere during the Bush administration, isn't expected to gain traction this year either as lawmakers struggle with an already heaving workload that includes health care, energy, financial regulatory reform and a Supreme Court confirmation. And it's likely to be a heavy lift next year, as lawmakers head into mid-term elections.
The White House is hosting a meeting of lawmakers next week on immigration. That session has been postponed twice though, an indication that the issue isn't on the front burner.
Nonetheless, dealing with the 12 million illegal residents now in the U.S. and finding ways to handle the flow of foreign workings is a priority for businesses in the high tech and agriculture sectors.
Mr. Obama said the U.S. needs to build on efforts to strengthen border security, and clarify the status of people who have put down roots illegally.
"We can't tolerate a situation where people come to the United States in violation of the law, nor can we tolerate employers who exploit undocumented workers in order to drive down wages," he said.
Mr. Obama said illegals who want to become citizens should be required to pay a penalty and taxes, then go to the back of the line for eventual citizenship. That's similar to the proposals put forward by the Bush administration.
"That is the fair, practical and promising way forward," Mr. Obama said. "And that's what I'm committed to passing as president of the United States."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124542409490731611.html
==================
GAAAAK. I'm highly suspicious. Here's my formula/theory -- he does exactly the opposite of what he says. So I'm guessing his solution is "make them all legal." He hired Nappy for a reason. She is pro-illegal. He also nominated Sotomayor for a reason. She's extremely pro-illegal.
.
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama said Friday that he wants to push comprehensive immigration reform through Congress before he leaves office, but he didn't elaborate on a timeframe for the politically thorny endeavor.
"I'm committed to passing comprehensive immigration reform as president of the United States," Mr. Obama said at the Esperanza National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast in Washington. "The American people believe in immigration."
The reform effort, which went nowhere during the Bush administration, isn't expected to gain traction this year either as lawmakers struggle with an already heaving workload that includes health care, energy, financial regulatory reform and a Supreme Court confirmation. And it's likely to be a heavy lift next year, as lawmakers head into mid-term elections.
The White House is hosting a meeting of lawmakers next week on immigration. That session has been postponed twice though, an indication that the issue isn't on the front burner.
Nonetheless, dealing with the 12 million illegal residents now in the U.S. and finding ways to handle the flow of foreign workings is a priority for businesses in the high tech and agriculture sectors.
Mr. Obama said the U.S. needs to build on efforts to strengthen border security, and clarify the status of people who have put down roots illegally.
"We can't tolerate a situation where people come to the United States in violation of the law, nor can we tolerate employers who exploit undocumented workers in order to drive down wages," he said.
Mr. Obama said illegals who want to become citizens should be required to pay a penalty and taxes, then go to the back of the line for eventual citizenship. That's similar to the proposals put forward by the Bush administration.
"That is the fair, practical and promising way forward," Mr. Obama said. "And that's what I'm committed to passing as president of the United States."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124542409490731611.html
==================
GAAAAK. I'm highly suspicious. Here's my formula/theory -- he does exactly the opposite of what he says. So I'm guessing his solution is "make them all legal." He hired Nappy for a reason. She is pro-illegal. He also nominated Sotomayor for a reason. She's extremely pro-illegal.
.
Similar threads
