I guess i could have an open mind to weisco... from past experiences I swore I would never touch another one...
I measure the cylinder today and it specs 3.3450 at top and bottum, but the new and old pistons spec 3.3125 on top and 3.3415 on bottum..
So the piston is 36 thou smaller than the bore on top and has only 10 thou on the bottum... Why would the pistons be so tapered?? I see the bottum to the polaris spec of 5 thou but what about the top? Does the weisco had the same specs?
As milehighassassin stated that the piston heats at different rates. The piston composition also plays into this. We can read into this a couple of different ways.
1. The OEM piston is of poor quality and has a very high expansion rate.
2. The piston is designed to expand, but never achieves the ideal heat to do so.
There seems to be a fix for both of these scenarios. Either way, the OEM pistons just don't seem to work well with this setup.
Remember that the crank throw is also an issue with these motors. It is adding a tremedous amount of side force to the piston. This is causing premature ring wear and ring land failure as well as piston skirt wear. So if the top of the piston isn't achieving optimal expansion it could still be allowing the piston to have some excessive tip inside the cylinder.
It has been my understanding that this motor design was developed from their race program. I see far too many variables with this. Race motors are maintained differently than consumer motors. These motors get proper fueling and heat differently. Most race programs usually operate with only the highest quality parts meaning everything has very precise tolerances.
Gets a person thinking anyway.
As for the Wiseco pistons. I don't know what I did with my measurements, but they had very little variance from top to bottom. They were much more consistant.
Wiseco earned a bad rep 20+ years ago. We used to say, "Wiseco, yeah I'm stuck on them". That was the joke, but the company is bigger than ever and making pistons for everything that needs one.
The same technology used in cast pistons is also being utilized by Wiseco in their forging process. This includes low friction coatings. And different materials being impregnated in the metal for heat tolerance and to control expansion.
I'm just more used to foreign motors I guess. Much tighter tolerances and far less failures. That is probably why I identified the piston slop as an issue back in 08. It had me shaking my head back then. And that is what got me looking for an aftermarket solution. There are other options, I just know that the Wiseco pistons brought everything well within spec so that is the route I chose.
Sorry about the long read. Just trying to shed a little more light.