Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The guys at Carl's told me it was definitely stiffened for 2011 and should be a great track.
Have FUN!
G MAN
Well that was BAD info! Picked mine up yesterday and the track is a POS - tips flex a LOT more than the Challenger on my Summit (XP track). Wheels are a joke too (really flimsy), as is the small diameter rear axle which uses plastic bushings at the rear adjustment window (not unlike the POS XP axles; fix there was to use the race axles which fit when you throw the plastic spacers in the garbage where they belong) and I had no idea you couldn't cut the rails down on a Poo to accomodate anti-ratchet drivers (I mean the bend in the rails is right up against the drivers... thus the need for the center windows? Not at all happy with my purchase so far...
Anyone run a C-Xtreme on their Poos? Looks to be about 1/4" clearance at the bulkhead so still plenty of room to go from stock 2.4 to 2.5 C-Xtreme.
Have FUN!
G MAN
Actually, the 5.1 is a really good track - it just depends on the type of snow you have. The 5.1 does an excellent job in the dry powder that we have in the rockies. Those that ride in snow with a higher moisture content have had good luck switching to a track with stiffer lugs.
Just run a search, lots of good info on the forums about swapping tracks.
Okay, thanks. I'm in the Pacific NW so dry snow is NOT in our vocabulary!
G
The guys at Carl's told me it was definitely stiffened for 2011 and should be a great track.
Have FUN!
G MAN
Mountainhorse, care to chime in?
Also, what is the weight of the 5.1?
According to the team leader of the new RMK-Pro's ... The track is identical to the previous Dragon single ply series V.1 tracks.
With a lighter overall sled... the track should "act" a bit stiffer in hardpack compared to the Dragons .
With as big of a weight reduction as the PRO-RMK's have from the previous Dragons... there may not be a direct translation .. the new chassis may not be improved by a much stiffer track like the Xtreme or HCR.
[/SIZE]
without getting into in this thread, do some more research on the different track options people have done on the IQ's (the pros pretty much have the exact same setup). the short version is poo doesn't really provided enough bulkhead clearance and a slightly shorter lugs track (2-2.25 ish) performs just as well as the 2.4s or 2.5s. the real answer is to extend the chain case or do a d&r. now what that is going to do to the handling of the new pro, who knows?
pv