2.6 vs. 2.75

[Klutch]

I posted earlier about converting my 146 9r to a 155. Trying to decide between these 2 tracks. Thought?

 

[Chadly]

Don't buy either. If you are switching to 3.5 drivers get the 300LX. That track is best suited for the 9R torque. Have TracksUSA.com cut it down to a 15". I think I was $1,250 with it cut and delivered to my doorstep.

Challenger 300LX

Camoplast, Challenger 300LX, $55.00 - $1,185.00

shop.tracksusa.com

 

[Klutch]

Don't buy either. If you are switching to 3.5 drivers get the 300LX. That track is best suited for the 9R torque. Have TracksUSA.com cut it down to a 15". I think I was $1,250 with it cut and delivered to my doorstep.

Challenger 300LX

Camoplast, Challenger 300LX, $55.00 - $1,185.00

shop.tracksusa.com

Dam. I figured you were going to say that!

 

[akmclean]

I posted earlier about converting my 146 9r to a 155. Trying to decide between these 2 tracks. Thought?

Besides durability I personally like the 2.75.

If your only options were between the 2.6 and 2.75, the 2.75 is a noticeably better track in deep snow (I've put a couple thousand miles on both). Polaris also has extrovert drivers for the 2.75 but not the 2.6 as of this year.

 

[Klutch]

Don't buy either. If you are switching to 3.5 drivers get the 300LX. That track is best suited for the 9R torque. Have TracksUSA.com cut it down to a 15". I think I was $1,250 with it cut and delivered to my doorstep.

Challenger 300LX

Camoplast, Challenger 300LX, $55.00 - $1,185.00

shop.tracksusa.com

Is this track a flex edge track? The description says " short width rods"

Also, do you use 6 tooth extroverts? Anit stab needed?

 

[Sheetmetalfab]

Is this track a flex edge track? The description says " short width rods"

Also, do you use 6 tooth extroverts? Anit stab needed?

Yes its “flex edge”

Oem polaris 6 tooth extroverts work great from the 275.

Oem Polaris anti stab.

 

[Chadly]

Is this track a flex edge track? The description says " short width rods"

Also, do you use 6 tooth extroverts? Anit stab needed?

^ What he said ?

 

[Klutch]

Yes its “flex edge”

Oem polaris 6 tooth extroverts work great from the 275.

Oem Polaris anti stab.

Maybe i'm missing something but isn't the 275 a 2.86 pitch? The 300lx is 3.5. So how the 275 drivers work with the 300lx?

 

[Sheetmetalfab]

Maybe i'm missing something but isn't the 275 a 2.86 pitch? The 300lx is 3.5. So how the 275 drivers work with the 300lx?

2.6 is 2.86 pitch.

2.75 is 3.5 pitch.

300lx is 3.5 pitch

I’m the first one to do this swap and post it up last summer

 

[Chadly]

2.6 is 2.86 pitch.

2.75 is 3.5 pitch.

300lx is 3.5 pitch

I’m the first one to do this swap and post it up last summer

And we all copied him because Alaskan riders ride so hard. Ask DuncanSteel ?

 

[Solarguy]

2.75 over the 2.6 for sure

 

[flying frenchman]

Sure love my 2.6 on my 650 155
Hooks up good, and don't melt my sliders.

 

[Klutch]

Yeah the only reason I was thinking 2.6 was I thought about keeping the hearing the 146 comes with..

 

[Snowman10]

My buddy put the Lynx track on his Polaris Boost and it is awesome. It pulls hard and is a much better option than the Polaris track. It is aggressive and fantastic in the trees and on the slopes.

 

[madmax]

Depends on where you ride and snow conditions. Based on your two choices, the 2.75 is a much better powder track. If your a deep powder rider and going to buy 3.5” pitch drivers, you may as well get the 300lx cut to 15” wide. The 3” 300lx is way better powder track than the 2.75. The flex edge doesn’t really flex, they cut most of it off when going 15” wide anyway.

 

[Klutch]

Thinking about trying the M66 from composite. So only a 2.6 lug. My riding at home at 2000' is the reason I want a little shorter lug.

What about pitch now, 2.86 vs. 3.00 vs. 3.5? It's available in all 3.

 

[Jaynelson]

2.6 was good at the time, but old news now as far as deep snow goes