162 163 or 174

[SNOW JW]

Way out Nytro build project may be year or two out but hey can't start to early right.

So what's your thoughts on the 162 2.5 extreme vs the 174''????

Also the Polaris 163 or 166 Poo is a sweet track in the powder do you think it would hold up to the boost??? Also could you get drivers for it???

Just looking to see what you guys think. My 153 was a kick maybe a little short for the the super steep stuff but fun as heck or I thought but thinking of trying something longer just to see how it does.

The 166 and 163 Polaris tracks are great for the powder and seem to not trench like the extreme's but who knows. I know my 166 seemed to go forever in the powder and did ok in the hardpack. To many choices.

 

[zebiraross]

You won't be disapointed with a 174". Especially with the boosted wheele happy Nytro. You need all you can to keep the front end down with the Nytro.

 

[SNOW JW]

But how does it do as far as in the trees???? And doing those tight spins???

I would try the 166 but I'm not sure I could keep it from ratcheting.

 

[noob]

dont' the polaris tracks warn you if you exceed said limit of speed that lugs will start flying off?? that's the only reason i would avoid those tracks if that's the case. I know with camoplast there has never been an issue with lugs flying off in my 5 turbo's sleds.

length depends on one thing. are you going to go chute climbing?? if not stick with the 162. if you like to climb chutes, go longer.

 

[SNOW JW]

Make a good point noob I never had them fly off but I never had 220+ hp on them either.

 

[noob]

Make a good point noob I never had them fly off but I never had 220+ hp on them either.

lol, i just remember having to take the little tag off all of my new polaris's that said anything over 77mph I believe, and it did happen too. I know these turbo sleds get the track going faster than that, going up hill that is. we've had ours up to 165 kph, which would be over 100 mph or close to it. check into it before you lay cash out for a polaris track, they could have rectified it.

 

[sledskiing]

I've ridden a Nytro 174 x 16 and i have a Nytro 162 x 15. The 174 felt a little "big" for me, Awkward but could probably get used to it. It's fine in the trees if the snow is deep enough. The 162 overall is much more user friendly. If you are pulling big chutes all the time a 174 is the way to go.

 

[ridehard1212]

Putting 163 Poo Track On My Stage2 Supercharger, Allen From Timbersled Is Building The Sled And That Is The Track He Runs On His. He Says Thats Its The Best Track+8lbs Lighter..

 

[zebiraross]

But how does it do as far as in the trees???? And doing those tight spins???

I would try the 166 but I'm not sure I could keep it from ratcheting.

It does great in the trees. Tight spots, a little more to deal with if your talking about it turning on a dime. Like what was said, it depends on what your going to be doing mostly. If you like climbing I would do a 174, if your more into boondocking a 162 might be better.