• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Consensus on 858 Weight

MTsled3

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 8, 2012
720
685
93
Belgrade, Montana
Wow you have Burandt #'s nice jobšŸ¦“šŸ˜¶
That's dry weight, and just guessing based on listed weights. The 800 started at 408 and I had a full slp pipe set that dropped 15lbs if I remember correctly. Didn't take much to get them sub-400. The 9r is stock other than a can
 

madmax

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
4,489
3,146
113
Salt lake city
My 2023 9R 155, 2.75 with manual start and no oil and no gas was 429lbs. I weighed a 24ā€™ catalyst 600 154 3ā€, manual start, no oil or gas on the same scale, same day, it was 434lbs.
The 2.75 track is a POS, so a realistic comparison would be the 9R with a 3.25, which is 10lbs heavier than the 2.75ā€. I think the 858 catalyst will be the best backcountry non turbo sled even built. I may eat my words next season.
 

Chewy22

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Oct 17, 2009
1,993
1,369
113
Montana
Per the snowest pod cast, the Catalyst 600 154, manual start is 32 lbs lighter then the comparable ascender 800. Wet with spare belt. They mentioned the overall 858 engine package (motor, intake, exhaust, ect) is 3 pounds lighter than the 600.

The less weight and more centralized package is going to be killer. Hoping to throw a leg over the 858 next Saturday.
 

Dam Dave

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Oct 27, 2001
4,302
2,252
113
Montrose
It's weird that Cat is letting people place orders for their new sleds but still hasn't posted dry weights. That tells me that the must not be as light as they hoped.
and when was the last time dry weights were posted for any Cat?
 

BeeDoo

Well-known member
Premium Member
Feb 12, 2008
450
91
28
42
UT
I maintain that overall weight comparisons are generally BS.
What percentage of riders could accurately tell you if their sled was at 1/4 or 3/4 tank of fuel just by feel? And that's a 30-35 lb weight difference.
If the machines are within 40-50 lbs, it is all about design, set-up, riding style/ability, and snow conditions.

That said, I'd ride a new Catalyst if given the chance!
 
P
Dec 15, 2018
1,060
872
113
Snowest podcast just did a ā€œ2024 weightsā€ episode. THEY say itā€™s 4 lbs lighter than the 600 and the 600 is the lightest sled they weighed Sumter 513 lbs (itā€™s either that or the 858 is lol) so yeah donā€™t quote me but I was surprised AGAIN and of course Iā€™ll be wrong when they say ,ā€oh itā€™s actually 8k s heavier than the heaviest sled ever built.ā€ Lol
 

Vern

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jun 14, 2004
2,454
1,285
113
hyrum utah
I just watched the snowest podcast. 9r 155x3.25 non estart with 7s was 520lbs rtr. 600 catalyst 154x3 non estart was 513lbs rtr. Said when they previously weighed an ascender alpha 154 it was 545lbs so thatā€™s a 32lb savings. Not to shabby. Doo free ride turbo 146 was the heaviest in the low 560ā€™s if I remember correctly.
 

WhiskeyTee

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Dec 12, 2013
374
209
43
Utah
I have been trying to find the weight of my 17 Mtn Cat 162. I would guess my Catalyst 154 3ā€ is 50lbs or more lighter than it is.
Feels like more than that riding itšŸ˜³
 

edgey

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jul 9, 2001
1,050
557
113
I just watched the snowest podcast. 9r 155x3.25 non estart with 7s was 520lbs rtr. 600 catalyst 154x3 non estart was 513lbs rtr. Said when they previously weighed an ascender alpha 154 it was 545lbs so thatā€™s a 32lb savings. Not to shabby. Doo free ride turbo 146 was the heaviest in the low 560ā€™s if I remember correctly.
You have to remember the Polaris holds more gas and oil. Also the the 7s is 3# heavier than the std gauge, 7s has a small battery to power up it up.

How much gas and oil did the ascender hold vs catalyst? Cat did a great job with the new chassis, but I hate when the manufacturers put a smaller tank on and want to talk wet weights. At this rate we will be riding sleds with 5 gallon tanks!!
 

10003514

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 17, 2007
1,237
779
113
34
British Columbia
The catalyst feels very very light moving in the garage and while riding. If the 858 is slightly less weight and a lower motor mount itā€™s going to be insane. Iā€™m hoping the after market companies can make a good pipe kit for the 858 and be similar to the current 800ā€™s weight loss and power gain of 15-18lbs 10hp.
 
C

clamlake600

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
179
55
28
Arctic cat is doing demos. West Yellowstone and island park are the mountain rides coming up. Next week in eagle River, Wisconsin.
Today was ERX race track in elk River, mn. Just north of the twin cities. We ran the sleds from 8-5 all day. Did 500 laps, and not too tired, actually. Great handling and bottom end torque on the new 858. Nice and crisp throttle, no lag, bogs, etc. They got this engine nailed down. šŸ˜€
 

Shattered1

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Oct 10, 2012
180
153
43
Juneau, AK
I think people make way too big of a deal out of weight.

A few pounds one way or the other isn't going to be noticable. And in most cases, 20 pounds one way or the other isn't going to be noticable unless the weight is up high.

Test ride one. If you like it, buy it. If you don't, don't buy it. Pretty easy solution to the problem.
 

turboless terry

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jan 15, 2008
5,567
6,767
113
Big Timber, MT
The aluminum boards are supposed to be 4 pounds lighter. You will want them. The plastic ones are garbage. Slick, buildup snow and break.
 

Old & slow

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 18, 2017
728
393
63
Alberta
The aluminum boards are supposed to be 4 pounds lighter. You will want them. The plastic ones are garbage. Slick, buildup snow and break.
The plastic boards are not even offered on the build site. Aluminum boards are the standard and the hardcore core tube boards are the option for the 4 pound weight saving. Looks like the plastic boards were a failed experiment this time at least. I bet they replace them on all the 2024 catalyst
 

MTN_VIPER

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
980
442
63
NW WA St.
fourstrokesolutionsllc.com
The plastic boards are not even offered on the build site. Aluminum boards are the standard and the hardcore core tube boards are the option for the 4 pound weight saving. Looks like the plastic boards were a failed experiment this time at least. I bet they replace them on all the 2024 catalyst
Interesting, never noticed that before (didn't read the fine print), I do wish that they had better pics of the standard aluminum boards though.
 
Premium Features