Whats the difference in Pol. 10-60's and BB weights?

[towngrunt]

I have reading on here what everyone is running on their Pro's at about 8 to 10,000 feet and I am seeing 10-60's and 62 bb weights. What is the difference and are the aftermarket weights worth the difference? I am running 10-60's right now and was wondering if I should make the change.

 

[NapaMatt]

Belly Buster Weights..

Are nice!

Pulls a lot harder i think.

Most of the time.. There right about the weight 10-60 weighing 60 grams and so on..

my .02

i am running them!

 

[towngrunt]

So if I am running 10-60's right now what would be a comparable weight in a BB or MTX etc.?

 

[2XM3]

mtx would be +3 or 4 grams

 

[NapaMatt]

BB would be 60BB weights

 

[volcano buster]

One advantage I am finding with after market weights is the fact that they are a lot closer in balance between the weights than the stock Polaris 10 series. I'm finding up to .7 grams difference on a set of 10-62 weights, which makes me a bit nervous.

 

[F-Bomb]

The profile of the weights cause them to feel or react differently. The actual gram weight is only part of the program. Remember it's all a combo of springs, primary weights, and helix angle that create your clutch function.

Polaris got pretty universally close on the PRO high alt setup. Carl's says about an average of 5 sled length benefit to their system. It appears to be a big plus in mid rpm pull but then also doesn't fade at the full shift out. My experience seems to support that statement. Their kit is a special TEAM cut helix and weight combo with different springs depending on your ap. I'm having good luck with very high "felt" performance and no adverse belt wear (heat or long pull fade) on their setup.