What would you like for a new track design?

[Doc Zoom]

I'm just curious what everyone feels would be a great new style track.
Would anyone buy a 2.6" deep lug? How about a 3" pitch finger style track for the new sleds? What is the industry missing?
Thanks for your input!
Doc

 

[cmantle1]

i would be curious about super-lug designs, but im just not sure what the happy medium is between the wieght and lug size. and isnt there a possibilty of just ripping the huge lugs off as soon as you hit non snow?

 

[Chubbydog]

How about one that's curled up on the outer sides to help with side hilling.

 

[winter brew]

A Maverick in a harder compound.

 

[Barnes]

A Maverick in a harder compound.

X2

I could live with them weighing 3-4 more llbs if they held up a little better.

I would like to see a company come out with a 15.5 wide track. The 16" wide tracks do work better then the standard 15" and with a 15.5 wide track, it would be easy to get a wider track under the standard 15" tunnels.

 

[Backcountry]

Lighter track with advanced materials to improve durability...

 

[6Mile]

Bring back the 136" x 2" finger track. All of the crossover sleds are now at the 136" length and the standard ripsaw is a joke in deeper snow. The 2" finger is tough and will hold up to midwest trail duty and will still move in the deeper snow.

 

[RX1Guy]

A Maverick in a harder compound.

Before i saw your post i was going to say a harder maverick!

a 2.5" maverick that doesnt fold so easily would be the perfect track.

 

[shmuckaluck]

easy take off.

I would like to see a track that could be separated like a chain when you take out a link. That way you could change your track in about 15 min. and change it for different snow conditions.

 

[rynokron]

i like the sound of the 3" pitch finger style. how about some kind of hybrib paddle/finger combo in a 162"? i would stay with a 2.5" lug.

 

[HYFLYR]

Maverick in a hard compound would be awesome.

Or, half maverick, half challenger. Keep the maverick outer lugs soft, and the inner lugs stiff like the challenger, probably not possible but i would try one out.

 

[Rixster]

The attack 20 in a 2.5 straight paddles and a HARD compound
Oh and 16 wide or 15.75 wide

 

[Nate]

The attack 20 in a 2.5 straight paddles and a HARD compound
Oh and 16 wide or 15.75 wide

BINGO!

 

[Mcx Nytro]

I thought the newer mavericks were a harder compound?????NO??

 

[2zeros]

Track needs?

20" wide x 180" long x 3" Attack-20. And you guys think I'm kidding!

 

[SLY]

Maverick 2.25 in a 3 pitch that is 15.75 wide. The paddles need to be remodelled slightly so they hold their shape. I am running a backwards Mav 162 on my Nytro. It was a little wide and the paddles are staying straight and I have had it up to 16lbs boost (nasty, LOL). It hooks up awesome, however, get's a little hairy coming downhill.

 

[Motley Doo]

An A-20 spun around backwards and run for a little bit turns into a like a 2 3/8 strait paddle, then they start working awesome! Friends experiment last year, mines on this year!

 

[SAWYER]

I want my track to have little rockets on it so it shoots me to the top of the hill

 

[Rixster]

An A-20 spun around backwards and run for a little bit turns into a like a 2 3/8 strait paddle, then they start working awesome! Friends experiment last year, mines on this year!

Yeah I have done this with both of mine, and it does work well. But the track is to soft. They really dont hold up well to sage brush, small sticks or rocks. They lose big chuncks.

 

[mtnsldr]

AT-20 in a 2.5" paddle, in a new pitch 3.25, and make the paddles stiffer.
If it adds 4-5lbs to the track so be it, it will last and hook up, that is what we are all after.

MtnSldr