Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

What track camo extreme 162" or 174"

I

IceCap

Well-known member
Presently I am running a 159" stock 2006 RMK 900 track and I was wondering if anyone has tried any of these two tracks?
From what I have heard they make a big difference in deep snow performance??
Also I am aware that the 05 and 06 poo 900 tracks with the 2.52" pitch and2.4 " lugs are possibly one of the best OEM tacks ever made.

So I do not want to change to a camo extreme to find out I am not gaining very much.
Please let me know your experiences.
 
I quess no one has tried a different track? Does anyone know where I could get a slightly used 166" track?
 
I quess no one has tried a different track? Does anyone know where I could get a slightly used 166" track?

we have run all three...personally I have run a 162 CE 2.5 and a 166 Po Series 4 on an 05 900...i loved bothm the challenger I think worked better, i am a big fan of stiff tracks and the challenger def liked the horsepower more and an all around stronger track. But the 166 is an amazing track as well. Problem with that is if you find one it will prob be well used or spendy...not many people go down in size, and the ones changing em are either tryin to pay for the 174 or changing cuz its fallen apart.
My buddy runs a 174 on his 06 900 and will never buy another track im sure, he is grins ear to ear! and can still lay it on its side and boondock with the best of em...the only issue he has had with his is some of the clips coming off, oh yah and he stabbed his first one with like 70 miles on it :-) total waste:beer;
 
we have run all three...personally I have run a 162 CE 2.5 and a 166 Po Series 4 on an 05 900...I loved both, the challenger I think worked better, i am a big fan of stiff tracks and the challenger def liked the horsepower more and an all around stronger track. But the 166 is an amazing track as well. Problem with that is if you find one it will prob be well used or spendy...not many people go down in size, and the ones changing em are either tryin to pay for the 174 or changing cuz its fallen apart.
My buddy runs a 174 on his 06 900 and will never buy another track im sure, he is grins ear to ear! and can still lay it on its side and boondock with the best of em...the only issue he has had with his is some of the clips coming off, oh yah and he stabbed his first one with like 70 miles on it :-) total waste:beer;

Good info:beer; I'm seeing that my 166 is a pretty good track, very happy camper here so far:D
 
Thanks for the info guy's I decided to order a new 166' from the dealer that way I also don't have to spend the 300.00 extra for new drivers 2.52 pitch vs 2.86.
Let it snow!
 
I paid 950.00 cnd , Presently I am running the 159"x 2.4 the main reason I went for a new track is that I wanted the 159"x 2.4 for my 2003 800 RMK which is a 151"x 2" now.

The 03 edge still runs strong and my wife really likes it.... so I am keeping it for now.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top