Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Taxpayers to pay for GM/Chrysler to lobby for Cap N Tax

Sensenbrenner calls the cops on GM and Chrysler's green lobbying
By: Timothy P. Carney
Examiner Columnist
06/19/09 5:51 PM EDT

Today, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, wrote Atty. Gen. Eric Holder to ask if bailed-out, taxpayer-owned carmakers General Motors and Chrysler are breaking any laws by continuing to lobby the federal government while owned by the federal government, Sensenbrenner's office has told me.

Specifically, Sensenbrenner singled out GM's and Chrysler's membership in the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a coalition of Fortune 500 companies and environmental non-profits dedicated to lobbying for federal restrictions on greenhouse gas--specifically, the sort of cap-and-trade scheme at the heart of the Waxman-Markey bill currently before the House.

A quote from the letter:

It makes no sense that taxpayer dollars could go towards a lobbying effort that will essentially raise taxes.... US CAP is advocating a carbon regulation scheme I call cap-and-tax. Higher manufacturing costs will be one of the many consequences of this bad policy, which will raise energy costs and increase the prices of many goods and services. The last thing the auto companies need are higher costs and it’s absurd that GM and Chrysler would use taxpayer dollars to press the case for pricier manufacturing.

GM announced it is cancelling all of its outside lobbying contracts--that is, firing all of the lobbying firms it retains--but has said it does not plan to close its in-house lobbying shop, which last quarter, amounted to about 83% of the company's $2.8 million lobbying budget in January, February, and March of this year.

I wouldn't expect any action from the DOJ, and it's not clear what law these companies could be breaking, but Sensenbrenner's move shows Republicans see plenty of opportunity in these auto bailouts to call shenanigans on the corporate-government alliance.
 
Why does this not suprise me.

We pay enviros to sue us, why not car companies we own also.
 
The whole lobby thing is retarded. The idea that a professional can be hired to make an elected politician do something is ridiculous. It smacks of pandering, interference and conflict of interests. I don't know why you just don't outlaw it all together and do what's right for your country.
 
We are also paying to advertise to us too. Should that be stopped also?

Until such time as the government returns the company to private ownership.
Yes.
The feds have no buisness, right or constitutional authority to prop up a buisness.
 
we should have let them fail. short term would have been bleak, but in the long run everything would be better off.
 
Until such time as the government returns the company to private ownership.
Yes.
The feds have no buisness, right or constitutional authority to prop up a buisness.

How much money has the govt taken from the people and the company in taxes? Just think of it as a temporary tax refund. :beer;
 
Don't tell me your ok with this Ruffy.

I don't think there has been a large company in the US that hasn't been propped up at one point in time. Jeez, didn't skidoo even do this a while ago too? (get money from the government, that is).
 
So no advertising for GM? I'm sure they will turn around if they don't advertise. LOL

If the feds were actually interesting in turning the company around they wouldn't have purchased the company to begin with, and when you own 60% of a company, you own it.

They should have done the same thing every other company does when it goes down. File bankrupcy and rebuild.

Ruffy, temporary tax refund?!?!
We have given them BILLIONS and we will see none of it back.
They have already forgiven over 15 BILLION dollars in debt, that's not a loan it flushing money down a hole to repay the unions.
 
Ruffy, temporary tax refund?!?!
We have given them BILLIONS and we will see none of it back.
They have already forgiven over 15 BILLION dollars in debt, that's not a loan it flushing money down a hole to repay the unions.

When the get profitable again, we will get it back. How much does GM pay to the govt every year in taxes?
 
Where in the constitution does it say they can't?

Where it spells out what their duties are.
Anything outside of what is spelled out in the constitution has to be given to the Federal government by the states. To the best of my knowledge there isn't one single state that has approved the feds to take over any companies.
 
When the get profitable again, we will get it back. How much does GM pay to the govt every year in taxes?

oh, ok.
I am having some financial problems right now.
How about you give me back all the money I have paid in taxes in the last 10 years, then forgive all that and I will start paying taxes again.
Sound like a good idea to you??
It would if you owned GM or were a UAW member.
 
oh, ok.
I am having some financial problems right now.
How about you give me back all the money I have paid in taxes in the last 10 years, then forgive all that and I will start paying taxes again.
Sound like a good idea to you??
It would if you owned GM or were a UAW member.

If the gov cared about you, then maybe so.. another "feel good" argument, or another, "That is not fair" argument?

Life isn't fair, deal with it. Anyways, aren't you the one that says that taxes on businesses are too much?
 
Premium Features



Back
Top