Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Suggestion: take care of the problem, don't just keep burying it

G

Good to Go

Banned
Moved: Why i will decline a free "paid premium membership"
RGM - 02-24-2010

Moved..? Seriously?? Where??

Was it because of something someone said..? By which standard..? Was it what the mod said..? or because he got called on it..?

Yea, I've got an idea and comment about how things could work better on Snowest ( YOUR words) In fact, lot's of people do.

Let's start with leveling the playing field. You've got mods that need to be moderated. I suggest as an 'employer', you start setting the standard.
 
Look, I'm not one to add to the drama as a general rule. I tend to be be level headed and prefer to compromise, but I agree on this one that it looks like the moderators and the site admin have placed themselves in an adversarial role. I know you take a lot of attacks and I'm sure it gets old but that's part of the job. Moderators are supposed to moderate, not attack and not use heavy handed censorship. And if you're going to have a section for people to post questions and suggestions, then it should be respected and when someone posts a question or suggestion it should be addressed, not ignored or hidden.

In the thread that has been moved, the person who opted not to accept a free membership posted his reasons in a calm, rational way and in no way did he attack any other person. He never even mentioned which mod offered him the membership and he never said anything personal about the mod. The moderator, on the other hand, took it way too personal and turned his response into a personal attack on the person who posted. Then he apologized...then he attacked again.

Moderators and site admin should be setting the standard for behavior. When a mod goes off and starts attacking a member FIRST, that's not cool. I've never actually seen that happen on any forum besides this one, and I was pretty surprised.

And the delays in response or moving of threads to a location no one else can access is making it much worse if you ask me. This "You're either with me or against me" attitude is driving more and more people away. I paid $30 for a 3 year membership and to my dismay I'm watching people continue to leave in anger. The ones that are leaving now aren't leaving in a fit of angst over the site going paid, they are leaving because some of the moderators and frequently the site admin are refusing to address legitimate issues, are heavily censoring what can be said (way beyond the posted rules), and are moving threads to inaccessible locations. IMO, the site admin and the mods need to disengage their ego from the job and be more objective and less defensive. If they can't do that, they should be replaced with people that can. Mods that allow their personal feelings to interfere with their objectivity about applying the rules in a fair manner should not be moderators.
 
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (3 members and 1 guests)
Good to Go, ruffryder+, smokindave

hmmmmph.. and???
 
EagleDee,

Very well written! You did a better job of saying some of the things I was trying to say in my 'letter'.

I especially liked this"
Moderators and site admin should be setting the standard for behavior.

It might be a good idea for a moderator to have two accounts. One that is their mod account, with an ID of simply "Moderator #XX", and then then their personal account. That could be one way to help separate the two roles.

It seems that the objections are getting more organized, and thought-out as of late- which is a good thing. My fear is that they don't care and won't listen.

Have a good day,
PE
 
It might be a good idea for a moderator to have two accounts. One that is their mod account, with an ID of simply "Moderator #XX", and then then their personal account. That could be one way to help separate the two roles.

I completely agree with this suggestion. Good idea.
 
EagleDee,

Very well written! You did a better job of saying some of the things I was trying to say in my 'letter'.

I especially liked this"

It might be a good idea for a moderator to have two accounts. One that is their mod account, with an ID of simply "Moderator #XX", and then then their personal account. That could be one way to help separate the two roles.

It seems that the objections are getting more organized, and thought-out as of late- which is a good thing. My fear is that they don't care and won't listen.

Have a good day,
PE

i disagree if there a mod then show them no reason to give them power and hide behind an alter name , this place is over moderated as it is with the deleting / moving and editing posts ...

i went to correct on a post of mine , some miss information and i cant edit any of my posts ? when did the edit button disappear ? and WHY ? lol

if i cant edit my own posts why the FUC* can mods edit them ?

this make any since to you ?

wanna fix snowest ? a good start is removing the 75 post cap and give back the basic guys there PMs

its not asking much

yeah i paid , and regret it since they did all the BS even though it didnt effect me it affected my friends which effects me ...

/rant off
 
Premium Features



Back
Top