Stock Shock weigtonht vs. Upgraded Clickers Weight?

[braapin]

I was wondering if anyone knows the weight difference between the stock PRO RMK Walker evans shocks and the upgraded Clicker Shocks for the ski shocks and rear track shock option? I know they are heavier, but not sure by how much. I think the shafts are also larger on the upgraded shocks. Trying to figure out if I want to pay the $400 for the clickers, or if I just want to stick to regular shocks and have them re-valved if I don't like how they perform. PS, sorry for the typo on thread title , cant figure out how to change it.

 

[Sheetmetalfab]

About the same as a water bottle.

 

[RMK935VA]

For the money difference, I would just get the W/Es revalved unless you are in the air or busting down a trail at high speed all of the time. My revalved W/Es (Carl's) on my 13 work perfectly for my riding style. You save weight and money and get a great shock that performs very well. I don't care about messing around with clickers either. It cuts into riding time and I am not sophisticated enough to be able to tell that much of a difference. If I had clickers, I probably would just leave them as they came from my dealer.

 

[Sheetmetalfab]

For the money difference, I would just get the W/Es revalved unless you are in the air or busting down a trail at high speed all of the time. My revalved W/Es (Carl's) on my 13 work perfectly for my riding style. You save weight and money and get a great shock that performs very well. I don't care about messing around with clickers either. It cuts into riding time and I am not sophisticated enough to be able to tell that much of a difference. If I had clickers, I probably would just leave them as they came from my dealer.

You must ride hard and fast!
I can't imagine not having enough time to turn a clicker knob halfway thru the day.
Hard snow in the morning that softens in the afternoon.
Whooped out trail to the goods.
Hauling gas and backing them off after pouring it in.

You must really be a BAMF.


Clickers for me.
And a revalve to fit me.

 

[CO 2.0]

The 3" also has the solid aluminum rear bumper and the 2.6 had the carbon fiber bumper. 3" snow flap is beefy with no holes and shaped like a scoop where 2.6 flap is swiss cheese and light. 3" is built a little tougher.

Entz just mentioned how he had time on the 2.6 and it was a much better track than the 2.4 (I had a 12 pro as well). Along with durability issues w driveshaft and belt drive I was concerned on the pro, he said he hadnt seen since 2013 w his sleds. I like the current 2.6 pc on my 14 cat and with selling it and keeping my 15 3" cat, just dont think i need or want two 3" sleds. In lower pow conditions I ride my current 2.6 pc more than the 3" pc

 

[Sheetmetalfab]

The 3" also has the solid aluminum rear bumper and the 2.6 had the carbon fiber bumper. 3" snow flap is beefy with no holes and shaped like a scoop where 2.6 flap is swiss cheese and light. 3" is built a little tougher.

Entz just mentioned how he had time on the 2.6 and it was a much better track than the 2.4 (I had a 12 pro as well). Along with durability issues w driveshaft and belt drive I was concerned on the pro, he said he hadnt seen since 2013 w his sleds. I like the current 2.6 pc on my 14 cat and with selling it and keeping my 15 3" cat, just dont think i need or want two 3" sleds. In lower pow conditions I ride my current 2.6 pc more than the 3" pc

Wrong thread?

 

[CO 2.0]

$hit, yup wrong thread.

 

[Topogigo]

Yes to the clickers

I just moved over from Cat. I had my second day on my 15 163 Terrain Dominator with the clicker shocks....Wow! 3 foot bumps on the trail are just fun. I am ordering my 16 163 Axys RMK tomorrow and it will for sure have the clicker shocks.