J
Jaynelson
Well-known member
We had talked about this a few years back - and basically the same coconut is still hanging out there. The 2017 models aren't all out yet, but I doubt this question will be answered in the 2017 model year.
Who is going to be the first to build a machine that establishes middle ground between the current sleds and the snow bike? Will this eventually be a way manufacturers go - or will we just slightly nicer/brighter/lighter/more powerful model updates on the ~5 year schedule? Ala the Axys or new Doo...huge upgrades, but still the same basic shape.
It seems like the tools are out there to build something that just KILLS even the newest stuff for mountain technical riding...say...13-14" wide 3-3.2" lug convex cut track. Narrow up panels further with lower profile clutches, exhaust and more airflow underhood. 32" ish stance. Or maybe even more extreme with some of those numbers...thoughts? Retain the power and traction of a sled, (nearly) the maneuverability of a bike. Less power loss from lighter track, less weight from less materials, etc, etc.
Completely not for the non-agressive or non-mountain rider - don't need a bunch of track lengths...just 1 or 2. Doesn't seem massively expensive to engineer.
Would it sell? Or are more people interested in factory turbo or something along those lines? Doo just commited to years with the new chassis. Arctic Cat...I just can't see it, but you never know. The snowbike they were showing is just that. Yamaha....yaaa. So I would *think* Pol would be the first to push this to the next level...but do you think it will happen and is there the market?
Who is going to be the first to build a machine that establishes middle ground between the current sleds and the snow bike? Will this eventually be a way manufacturers go - or will we just slightly nicer/brighter/lighter/more powerful model updates on the ~5 year schedule? Ala the Axys or new Doo...huge upgrades, but still the same basic shape.
It seems like the tools are out there to build something that just KILLS even the newest stuff for mountain technical riding...say...13-14" wide 3-3.2" lug convex cut track. Narrow up panels further with lower profile clutches, exhaust and more airflow underhood. 32" ish stance. Or maybe even more extreme with some of those numbers...thoughts? Retain the power and traction of a sled, (nearly) the maneuverability of a bike. Less power loss from lighter track, less weight from less materials, etc, etc.
Completely not for the non-agressive or non-mountain rider - don't need a bunch of track lengths...just 1 or 2. Doesn't seem massively expensive to engineer.
Would it sell? Or are more people interested in factory turbo or something along those lines? Doo just commited to years with the new chassis. Arctic Cat...I just can't see it, but you never know. The snowbike they were showing is just that. Yamaha....yaaa. So I would *think* Pol would be the first to push this to the next level...but do you think it will happen and is there the market?