Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

SNOWEST FORUMS: Member Comments on "Letter to All Members"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thats a good idea SMWIZZZ, about a Q/A thread. No inputs just questions and answers. I will have ask Christopher to create one.

As for Sturgis it seems that for some people that want to leave SW. Well, why are they still here? . Don't set around gripping about wanting to leave. Seems that the bad apples just want to make things worse here for the other sledders. This is a sledding site, not a school yard.
Be adult.

As for the advertisers, they should not have to pay for things like the max thread. There is nothing sledding about that thread.
And that is why what ever is left over goes to non-profit clubs to help our cause.


Ok. Fine. You want me to leave, I will leave. Also, as a moderator, please delete my thread on my custom mountain sled build in the Mountain section. Also, delete my user ID since you consider any dissenting voice as 'griping'. If that is way you view the people who have supported this site, then just delete me now.

If you mean by voicing our opinions on NOT wanting to pay a fee, then I guess you consider that griping (not gripping). I suppose you consider debates as one side as having your point of view and the other side just griping?

I thought the site genuinely interested in our input. Thank you for sheading light that they are NOT. They only want the comments that agree with them, all other are just griping. To quote you ver-batem.

Jeez. Talk a dictatorship style site. I guess the moto of the new site should be "Voice your opinion as long as you agree with us: otherwise, keep your griping to yourself".

YOUR a moderator????

You have no IDEA how a site works. The advertisers pay to put their adds on the site...period. They don't allocate funds to one section of the site, they allocate them to the W H O L E site. The whole site is what gets people to the site, all aspects of the site.

Nice...VERY nice (sarc)
 
You know. That is really just so sad. Seems people care more about a snowmobile site then snowmobile riding areas. I think I am going to go write a letter...


From Earlier...


SuitCase69: Snowest will have a pay-per-click automated letter writing machine with flashing text and audio. (JAVA or VBScript - your choice)

You simply put your VISA card in one side, click on which canned letters you want to send, select who the letters are being sent to, agree to the terms and click save. It will automatically send the form letter and charge your card a nominal $00.99 fee per item. If you want only email submission, the fee goes down to $00.19 per submission.

Heck - that's what everyone pays for a song at the iTunes store!
Cheap, killer deal.

They're 99.999 sure this will increase the submission of letters to various decision makers, as we're making it easy to contact them!
The first 25 letters are free with your paid, 3 year subscription to the 4M. (applies to email only, of course)

;-)


OK, none of that is true, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night!!
 
You know. That is really just so sad. Seems people care more about a snowmobile site then snowmobile riding areas. I think I am going to go write a letter...

Not true at all...I think your assumptions are completely wrong. I would rather give my 10 bucks to the Idaho Association, Blu Ribbon, or SAWS then to forum dues. I think it is sad that SW is trying take money from that pool of cash for private profit instead of giving back to an industry that made them very well off.

In my opinion, people have so much to spend on this sport and that creates a limited pool of cash to spend....I think most passionate riders spend money on important organizations that fight for our public lands....like I stated, I think it is sad SW is trying to take money from that pot for their own reasons.


.
 
Nah...

Believe it or not, stuff like blue ribbon coalition, saws etc are passed along here. There are so many things I have learned here that I never had a clue about before. Check out avalanche safety. I have always been prepped but on occasion I look at what ppl are packing in their packs here online. I have found some useful tools and tips there. Don't misunderstand what is happening. We all care.

I for one support two clubs that are affiliated with the BCSF and the Alberta Snowmobile Association. They are both active in keeping our lands open.... which reminds me... I gotta pay them soon..... more $$$...



You know. That is really just so sad. Seems people care more about a snowmobile site then snowmobile riding areas. I think I am going to go write a letter...
 
Dude, SW's super-double-secret executive conferences tell us that membership market carrying capacity is running somewhere around $49.95/month if we really pull this off sooner than later. Remember these are folks who have 10K sleds, 40k trucks, 69.00 DirecTV, on and on...

If we simply get 500 members x 49.95 x 12 mos = $299,700 !
How do we say Hawaii! New servers galore...

500 may not sound like much, but with 36,000,000,000 lurkers we're sure to be able to hook just enough to our goodness; after all someone worked at a SPAM shop before....

If we only had ANY revenue from vendor ads...



Why not try $4.99/yr, and see if you still have 35,000 members?
 
Everyone in the Max thread are STILL snowmobilers. And thats not the whole thing. But thank you for taking one part out of context. That is how things get blown out of proportion.

A Few times through the 500 some odd pages of the max thread there has been sled related info. There that should be work. And that is fine the max thread is not suppose to be sled related according to most of the people that post there.

As for the donations, I think it is good either way. As long as the money reaches them I don't see a problem.

Ask your question to Christopher again. I am sure he just missed it. It has been pretty ...hectic.. Trying to put the fires out that a few people have started on purpose, just to get people rilled up.

I am not on a high horse or anything like that. If you could see what I have actually done as far as moderating you would think the same as me. One infraction the whole time, some people have given out tripple even quadrouple compared to me.
But, I understand the length of time I have been here clouds everything. And I am truley sorry for that. I have done nothing but give you everything you have asked for. I have been honest and totally respectful. What do I get in return bashed an flamed for every thing.
And thats ok. I will still be totally honest, and respectful.
Thanks
jeff

As I said before : Take the fact that I am a mod out of this discussion.
 
Last edited:
Did you ever see the movie Caddy Shack? (1980)

Did you ever see Caddy Shack II? (1998 where Hollywood execs totally phuked up the series; movie by committee)

Nuff said.

MD.
 
How the hell did I take anything out of context???? You make those two statements separately from the rest of your post and they did not relate to the rest of your post. You made a blanket statement that the advertisers shouldn't have to pay for the max thread because "there is nothing sledding in it". I didn't take it out of context you flapped your gums and now you don't like it.

You are one of the top 3 most complained about modrators on the site, and the only thing that relates to the amount of time you've been on here is that YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE PEOPLE HERE OR THE HISTORY HERE, but you will interject yourself in things that you have no business in.

remember reporting posts from the max thread because you didn't think there was a "good reason" for someones chosen verbage in their signature?
 
FWIW and piled on top, this was my response on a CO thread, but I got off topic a bit and figured it belonged here. Man AR is making out like a fat cat on points with this one! a bribe perhaps. lol (save your money) I have not read more than a few pages of this, but I think I have the general "flavor"

this is how I "see" things as they appear from out here. Not intending this as a personal attack against anyone, just the way it looks to me. I think your all generally good folks, but even good people make mistakes.

I'm friends with several of your "troublemakers" and while I may not agree with their methods all the time (in your face hard!), I do think they have legitimate beefs. I've witnessed all the inside stuff and exactly what has transpired between them and some of the admin/mods. In short, the moderation was done unprofessionally and sometimes with obvious malice. Can't say I blame them for having hurt feelings, but moddin is a JOB that's not suited to everyone. If you can't rise above the fray and behave professionally, then get out of the game.

In answer to "where is everybody going" in the CO section....

I'll be where my sleddin buddies/friends are. SW has been my home forum for 5 years and I've enjoyed the fellowship and tips i've found here, but i feel like i'm being cornered into an ethical dilemma, and i'm not exactly a model of morals and ethics! lol Guess I'm not doing to bad though, cuz I know something is fundamentally wrong here.

It's painfully obvious that all these "new" people taking over are having a hard time handling the situation, and have no problem abusing their "special buttons".

Note that I say "new". By that I mean to include the new people that have been here for years, but are now acting in a new way. To see these people who have been around for years now at odds with their fellows and participating in this new regime is upsetting.

I'm not generally a "hateful" person, but i'm really starting to hate this new regime and what it is doing to the fellowship that used to be pretty healthy on here.

I always thought of this forum as a good model for on-line forum interaction. People could say what they wanted and generally not be censored. And, when they were censored, the vast majority agreed with it. I used to hold the moderators and admin in high regard for running the best forum on the net (imo). They gave enough rope to the outliers to keep it interesting, but kept it clean enough for the general audience to enjoy. A great balance was maintained and again, my hat is off to them. I never realized what a fantastic job they did, but I do now.

And, when I say "special buttons" I mean the one's that say "stomp freedom of speech", "opress opinions", "re-write history (lie)", "poke fun of and abuse member", "humiliate member", "puff up my tiny ego", "fulfill my personal agenda"...I think you get the idea.

It's hard to express the disdain I have for people who use their privaledged position in these ways. The freedom to express opinion is sacred to me, but through witness of your actions, I can see that it is not held in high regard by this new regime.

When your regime started re-wording posts (lieing), changing user names (lieing), abusing members for disagreeing, and all the other un-ethical and morally decrepit behavior I have seen, I was stunned and thought those were isolated incidents that would not be approved of by admin. Now I see that the top admins condone this behavior and take part in it as well.

I would have doubted it before, as SW has always been sponsored by what I thought of as the moral and ethical people at HP, but now it appears as if the decreptitude may run higher up the ladder than i would have thought.

I would fully expect that when the powers that be at Harris Publishing take a closer look at how this regime is operating in their name, there will be some changes made in how the moderation/administration of this site is carried out.

Regarding all the new bells and whistles and servers, go for it, knock yourself out and make this site a model of....well, whatever your trying to accomplish. I don't care about that stuff and have no problem paying a nominal fee. I never be-grudge a man lining his pockets a little when he has something good to sell. The internet has spoiled a lot of us with all the free access, but I think SW is/was a premium site and worth a few bucks, at least.

Finally though, nothing you can offer will keep me here if you continue to abuse my friends and fellows who, while they may lie somewhat outside the bounds of the average membership, do bring a very important element of diversity to the forum that make this site that much more interesting.

I see what they do and how they love to badger you, but please, be judicious and prudent in your use of the "special buttons". Instead of distastefully "smacking" them down, take the high road and maintain your dignity. There are myriad ways you can maintain order and influence people without stepping on their human rights. Show them a basic level of respect in this regard and try to keep your personal feelings to yourself. I don't envy your jobs one bit, but if I was in your shoes, I would stick to a code of personal behavior that would not jeapordize the foundations upon which everything rests...allowing your brethren their fundamental human rights and respect. Endeavor to adhere to this basic philosophy and you will maintain the loyalty of the members. Fail to try and you will not see nor hear from the multitude of people who will choose not to be a part of this new forum... The average guy who doesn't make waves or stir the pot, but comes here for fellowship and advice or just to browse the site will see how you treat the dissidents and you'll awaken his quiet dissident, but the only notice you'll have from him is one less number on your bottom line.

How will it all work out in the end, anybody knows, but I wish you luck and success in making this forum as good as it can be and in bringing back the qualities that made it great fun to be a part of.

Probably been mentioned, but why not base membership cost on accumulated points or some kind of respect rating? A kind of reward to the guys giving out tips or otherwise contributing. Quite a few of those peeps are the ones moving on I think. Course, you'd have to make it cheat proof ;)
 
Super Moderator...ok. lol. And that's another thing that's screwed up now...Don't take to personal arfrce, you just applied for the job, not your fault you got it, but most people should not be moderators. Your one of them! In fact, i can only think of a very few that can pull it off. Most have way too much "personality" they need to get out there, when the key criteria should be low key folks without agendas who spend more time observing and less interacting. Sorry, boss man don't get to play with the workers.
 
Originally Posted by ruffryder
It seems like what a lot of people don't get, is the fact that there are a lot of people that welcome this change and welcome the increase in moderation. Guess there maybe too many snowest bullies around. Read all the posts from Chris and catwoman. They get a lot of pms about this stuff it seems, and they are responding. Something to think about. There are a lot of people on this forum that are only lurkers. Seems they are trying to get those people out of the woodwork and more active.

Correct you are. That has been one of our goals from day one.


I'm a lurker. I don't post much because I am new to sledding, this will be only my second year riding. But if you think charging me $10 per year will get me more active you are very wrong.
 
MySpace, Facebook, and YouTube are all free and they offer a heck of lot more than this site.

How is it that they can make it with MILLIONS of customers, huge server farms and still do it for free?

They have the ads. Well so is Snowest going to have the ads, so why do we need to pay?

Sounds like Harris Publication needs to get some web savy professionals to be running their internet sites. Get the ad based on ALL their mags and run all the ads across all the lines and skip having to charge us for acess.

Since WE are the contributors that make this website what it is why don't we get paid for our contributions?

Funny how Harris Publication wants to USE our knowledge that we share with others to advance the importance of the site yet they take all the money generated for themselves.

When was the last time Snowest or Harris Publications solved your sled issue? Sure they take money from the manufacturers to review and advertise their sleds to us, but again, when was the last time they fixed your issue?
 
sounds like a money crab to me. a paid forum? what is to stop everyone from moving to a new(free) form..trust me there are lots, this just seems to be the best IMO..but if people move on then it may not be.i geuss thats hows the world works.. nothing good comes free..im not sure what i will do..but i think this will hurt snowest in the end.. geuss some of the riders that give top notch post should charge snowest for the info they post??? sorry to here:confused:
 
dsp81,

Hey there are several new 4M sites popping up where you could get a jawb as a MOD again! Two are live today, and more to come.

Clearly SW will be able to turn a profit on the 5% of people left here, and the other 95% are gaining options almost daily!

MD.
 
dsp81,

Hey there are several new 4M sites popping up where you could get a jawb as a MOD again! Two are live today, and more to come.

Clearly SW will be able to turn a profit on the 5% of people left here, and the other 95% are gaining options almost daily!

MD.

Witty retort. I've always found facts particular bothersome. Best way to address them is with straw men. I would have thought, given the breadth of your knowledge, that you would have left to create your own highly profitable site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Premium Features



Back
Top