Yesterday was a pretty fun expierence. I was out on the hill with my 08 TD8 and got a chance to ride with each of the newest sleds. I have read all the reviews of this vs that but yesterdy I got to see it first hand.
Location: Molas Pass Colorado
Conditions: About a foot of fresh in the trees...less in the open
Sleds : 2011 M8 sno pro 153, 2011 Assault 155, 2010 XP 154...and my turbo
So we went to a popular climb that we have dubbed our own "Turbo Hill". I was able to get some first had perspective on the differences between the three. So here is what I observed and or thought after it was all over.
Strait Climb/ Up hill Drag race
We raced all three sleds up turbo hill multiple times. The 2011 M8 seemed to be the quickest of the three. The assault launched very well and got on top of the snow quickly. About half way up the hill all three were within a length of each other. That is where they started to seperate. I dont know if the assault track was a difference but the XP and M8 pulled ahead when the hill got steep and the snow softened a bit. I kinda expected this result. I wish we would of had a pro-rmk 155 to compare but that was not the case. The XP and the M8 traded wins with the assault very close behind (maybe 2 sleds length). Then of course I spotted them all about 50 foot and flew by them, skis in the air and grin ear to ear. Man I love turbos....but thats not what this write up is about. Conclusion....The M8 probably would have to be my winner for this part of the review. XP-2nd, Assault 3rd
Trees, Side-hilling, Tight tech riding
Drag racing is cool and is def bragging rights but that is not what we do most of the time on these mountain sleds. When we got in the trees the sleds started to shine. I can not believe how easy the pro-assault was to manuever quickly through the trees. It really is a balanced chasis and takes very little effort to make it respond. The assault also easily held the best side-hilling ability. This I feel is directly because of the chasis balance. The XP had a tendency to fish out on side-hills but was great through the trees. The XP also was by far the easiest to get unstuck and yes...all three were stuck multiple times each. The ski-doo also felt very nimble in the trees. Both the assault and the XP felt almost like "Dirt bikes". Very thin and responsive. M8 felt like it was heavier for sure in the trees. The m8 chasis felt dated to me. Almost like there was to much weight down low (probably bad description) and took much more effort to charge through the trees. Side-hilling on the M8 was easy though and would be ranked 2nd behind the assault. I really did like the M8 balance front to rear...just a lil heavy for my liking. Conclusion.... Assault 1st, M8-2nd, XP 3rd
Trails.....Who really cares.
I talked to all three owners extensively about what they would change
Assault- He would change the factory clutching (lighter weights), stronger rails( already folded a set this season) and a better rear bumper (his was missing)
XP- He would change the intake(said it has frozen up), factory clutching is terrible, and most of all the price...said he paid just under 13k for his sled
M8- would delete the moving handle bars, said he wished his 2011 didnt look like a 09 still (graphics maybe?), wished it was lighter after riding the pro!
So, I gave it my best to do a fair review. As a polaris guy it hurt to lose each drag race but oh well. I think what I took from this time on the hill is that each company makes a really solid sled, each excelling in different catagories. I have to say that I was very impressed by the pro handling, impressed by the M8 factory clutching and impressed that someone would spend 13k for a sled (WTF). All in all, each machine is very high quality and should make any owner proud!!!!!
Location: Molas Pass Colorado
Conditions: About a foot of fresh in the trees...less in the open
Sleds : 2011 M8 sno pro 153, 2011 Assault 155, 2010 XP 154...and my turbo
So we went to a popular climb that we have dubbed our own "Turbo Hill". I was able to get some first had perspective on the differences between the three. So here is what I observed and or thought after it was all over.
Strait Climb/ Up hill Drag race
We raced all three sleds up turbo hill multiple times. The 2011 M8 seemed to be the quickest of the three. The assault launched very well and got on top of the snow quickly. About half way up the hill all three were within a length of each other. That is where they started to seperate. I dont know if the assault track was a difference but the XP and M8 pulled ahead when the hill got steep and the snow softened a bit. I kinda expected this result. I wish we would of had a pro-rmk 155 to compare but that was not the case. The XP and the M8 traded wins with the assault very close behind (maybe 2 sleds length). Then of course I spotted them all about 50 foot and flew by them, skis in the air and grin ear to ear. Man I love turbos....but thats not what this write up is about. Conclusion....The M8 probably would have to be my winner for this part of the review. XP-2nd, Assault 3rd
Trees, Side-hilling, Tight tech riding
Drag racing is cool and is def bragging rights but that is not what we do most of the time on these mountain sleds. When we got in the trees the sleds started to shine. I can not believe how easy the pro-assault was to manuever quickly through the trees. It really is a balanced chasis and takes very little effort to make it respond. The assault also easily held the best side-hilling ability. This I feel is directly because of the chasis balance. The XP had a tendency to fish out on side-hills but was great through the trees. The XP also was by far the easiest to get unstuck and yes...all three were stuck multiple times each. The ski-doo also felt very nimble in the trees. Both the assault and the XP felt almost like "Dirt bikes". Very thin and responsive. M8 felt like it was heavier for sure in the trees. The m8 chasis felt dated to me. Almost like there was to much weight down low (probably bad description) and took much more effort to charge through the trees. Side-hilling on the M8 was easy though and would be ranked 2nd behind the assault. I really did like the M8 balance front to rear...just a lil heavy for my liking. Conclusion.... Assault 1st, M8-2nd, XP 3rd
Trails.....Who really cares.
I talked to all three owners extensively about what they would change
Assault- He would change the factory clutching (lighter weights), stronger rails( already folded a set this season) and a better rear bumper (his was missing)
XP- He would change the intake(said it has frozen up), factory clutching is terrible, and most of all the price...said he paid just under 13k for his sled
M8- would delete the moving handle bars, said he wished his 2011 didnt look like a 09 still (graphics maybe?), wished it was lighter after riding the pro!
So, I gave it my best to do a fair review. As a polaris guy it hurt to lose each drag race but oh well. I think what I took from this time on the hill is that each company makes a really solid sled, each excelling in different catagories. I have to say that I was very impressed by the pro handling, impressed by the M8 factory clutching and impressed that someone would spend 13k for a sled (WTF). All in all, each machine is very high quality and should make any owner proud!!!!!