Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Replace that bolt???

TRS

Life Member
Lifetime Membership
Artic Cat Ski-Doo Yamaha FXR
As many bolts that have failed, I think we should replace the rear pto motor mount bolt every 750-1000 miles.
This one destroyed both clutches and the belt.
The belt caught the head when it broke and ran it through them both.
IMG_5285.jpeg
 
This is the mount that got updated for 25, right?

Any impact to how that mount is stressing the bolt?
 
Tony,
Whats the specs on that bolt. Size?
 
Last edited:
The flange head bolt is a M10x1.5x40
Class 10.9
The bolts have failed on the ‘19-‘24.
The ‘25+ have the two bolt mount.
I have been searching for a better option.
I recommend using a stock replacement for now.
10.9 and 12.9 class bolts have an issue with zinc electroplating.

That was an interesting read. I've heard before you shouldn't use a top-grade bolt where it's not needed, but didn't realize it could be more likely to fail in some circumstances. Bummer that you can't just drop an ARP bolt in there. Hopefully periodic replacement with the Polaris bolt prevents this kind of failure. I've gotta wonder if this is another cost-cutting problem and a bolt from a top-tier supplier would prevent it to begin with - the article mentions that plating and heat-treating processes (part of what makes high-grade fasteners stronger) contribute to the problem when not carefully done. That probably gets short-changed with a low-cost supplier. Hopefully there's a permanent solution out there - great "heads up."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TRS
That was an interesting read. I've heard before you shouldn't use a top-grade bolt where it's not needed, but didn't realize it could be more likely to fail in some circumstances. Bummer that you can't just drop an ARP bolt in there. Hopefully periodic replacement with the Polaris bolt prevents this kind of failure. I've gotta wonder if this is another cost-cutting problem and a bolt from a top-tier supplier would prevent it to begin with - the article mentions that plating and heat-treating processes (part of what makes high-grade fasteners stronger) contribute to the problem when not carefully done. That probably gets short-changed with a low-cost supplier. Hopefully there's a permanent solution out there - great "heads up."
I would think a company like ARP would tightly control the heat treating process, and all manufacturing steps for that matter considering they cost around $4 a bolt.

Per the article hydrogen embrittlement is generally associated with the electroplating process. All the ARP bolts I have bought have been black in color so I don’t think they are electroplated but need to verify.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7008.jpeg
    IMG_7008.jpeg
    455 KB · Views: 4
I would think a company like ARP would tightly control the heat treating process, and all manufacturing steps for that matter considering they cost around $4 a bolt.

Per the article hydrogen embrittlement is generally associated with the electroplating process. All the ARP bolts I have bought have been black in color so I don’t think they are electroplated but need to verify.
Yup, I've got to wonder - if the bolt in question was the same type and rating, but made to ARP's standards, would this be happening? Might be the result of a low-cost supplier cutting corners. I've bought a dozen or more ARP bolt sets (mostly black, some stainless) and never broken one. It seems their 8740 chrom-moly fasteners are black oxide coated. I have no idea if embrittlement isn't a problem with that process, or if they can prevent it. Either way, they obviously know what they're doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRS
Premium Features



Back
Top