Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Pro RMK vs RMK assault

I'm looking at a PRO RMK vs RMK ASSAULT. This will be my first mountain sled coming from a crossover. I still do some trail riding in MI, but spend more time in WY riding mountains. So, is the assault, by chance, better on trail than the PRO? And, is the Assault favored over the PRO in mountain powder riding? I don't do cornice drops or even too much jumping. Conversely, are the setups for the RMK line to make them a little more trail friendly?
 
Assaults shocks are stiffer, but externally adjustable if I remember right.

Assaults front stance is an inch or two wider.

Assaults come with the HARD competition tracks and they are not as good in powder.

Other than that...they are the same.
 
scott hit the nail on the head, suspension is tho only real difference.

the assault track will be better on the trails, but suck in the pow.

depends on what you want to do the most of...
 
If you can find an Assault with the powder track I would say get it. I just did some adjustments on my Assault earlier this week and rode it yesterday and the difference in set up was spot on. On the front of the suspension where it bolts into the tunnel there is a slot about an inch above it drill that out and put your suspension there. Last week riding in WY my sled was wheeling too much so I softened the front shock and stiffened the rear. My sled before was fun but after yesterday in the deep I couldn't believe the difference it made.

It kept the front end down and climbed like a billy goat, it was the 2nd best mod I have done to my Assault the best mod I have done would be the Air frames. I also put the ski's in the narrowest spot and clicked the shocks all the way to the softest setting and then added 2 clicks of hard on both sides. I weigh around 180 fully geared and the sled just flat rocked yesterday.

Sorry it's so long but hopefully this helps a little.
 
If I was buying, I'd get an assault with 2.5 camo extreme with about a 153 or 155 and narrow the stance as far as she'll go. Bam. Pull the chord.
 
It's not the Assault that has the rep for trenching...it's the competition track on the Assault that has the rep for trenching.
 
ohh don't get me wrong, it trenches, but still it's not THAT bad. Honestly, if your an average rider, an assault will take you more places than you need to be anyways.
 
I found myself in the same situation last year, from MN and ride MI, buying first mt sled, coming off a crossover, occasional trail riding. I ended up with an assault and a friend ended up with an standard rmk. I've only had 2 rides out west so far (1 last season, 1 this season) but here is what I've noticed. The comp track hooks up really well here in the flat lands and the suspension rocks for banging ditches, trails are a little tuff, it leans in the corners, I just picked up a sway bar off eBay from a pro rmk, although I haven't tried it yet cause there is no snow here. The difference between the 2 sleds in the mountains is minimal I feel the track does trench more, the 5.1 seems to get unstuck easier, but the comp track seemed to hold a side hill better, it wouldn't wash out as much. This year I bought a 5.1 take off form tracks USA and moved the suspesion to the "rmk" hole and we will see how this setup works next week we will be in togwotee. My intention is to swap tracks when I ride the flatlands.
 
Both awesome sleds and I wrestled with the same question during snowcheck last year. After a lot of research and pondering I ended up with the Assault with the powder track. NO regrets!! The sled is awesome, and the shocks kick azz over the stock RMK shocks. I do like to do some jumps here and there, so the shocks do shine.

I don't think you would be disappointed either way but I can tell you the Assault with a powder track rocks!

Here's a good read on the topic.

http://www.snowestonline.com/forum/showthread.php?t=248439
 
update

Thanks for all of the great input! I have made my decision. After much time and consideration, I ended up going with a Summit 146 SP 800 etec.

It boils down to 2 things for me.
1. I currently have 600 etec and love it. I have a hard time going back to using oil again (so to speak) even though the reality is only a few dollars per year based on my riding habits.
2. I do still ride trails intermittently and the summit has a 'flatter' cornering demeanor as opposed to the 'tippy' RMK demeanor. This is confirmed above and by a riding buddy who has ridden both.

I'm pretty much a rookie mountain rider with 3 trips totalling 12 days in 3 years in the mountains, so any of the sleds would be more than I'm capable of anyways!

I also got the summit for virtually same price as the RMK, which helped.

I've not ridden either sled, so I hope I went the right way.

Jason
 
Premium Features



Back
Top