Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Polaris rakes in cash!

D

deepdiver

Well-known member
Polaris $13.6M Profit-Sharing Payout Sets Record
The recreational vehicle manufacturer said $13.6 million of its 2010 profits will be doled out to employees—a record amount for the company.

Just a week after Polaris Industries, Inc., announced improved annual financial results, the recreational vehicle manufacturer said it would issue $13.6 million in profit-sharing checks to employees.

The company said that the $13.6 million—which is a record profit-sharing figure—will be shared among about 2,250 hourly and non-salaried employees in a cash payment. On average, each of these employees will receive nearly 19 percent of their annual pay base.

Medina-based Polaris will also distribute profit-sharing payments to each of its full-time salaried employees.

“We delivered strong performance and posted record results in 2010, and it feels good to reward the hard work and dedication of our employees,” Scott Wine, Polaris CEO, said in a statement. “It is fundamental to our culture that all employees share in the success they worked so diligently to create.”

The company also said Monday that it will distribute $8.1 million worth of Polaris stock that will be contributed to employees’ retirement plans.

Polaris, like many manufacturers in the state, has struggled amid declining consumer spending—but the company’s 2010 annual results showed improvement.

Sales for the year increased 27 percent to $1.99 billion and the company posted a 46 percent increase in its 2010 net income.

The company has recently made restructuring moves to cut costs and strengthen its balance sheet.

In May 2010, the company announced that it was closing its manufacturing facility in Osceola, Wisconsin, as part of a realignment that resulted in the loss of about 515 jobs. The company also said it will upgrade its production facilities in Roseau—where snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, and Razor products are assembled—and in Spirit Lake, Iowa, where Victory motorcycles and some other vehicles are assembled.

It also announced at that time that it will open a new facility in Mexico, likely in the Monterrey/Saltillo area, during the first half of this year.

Polaris is among the state’s 30-largest public companies based on its 2009 revenue, which totaled $1.57 billion.
 
They make more profit by screwing paying customers out of the warranty coverage they deserve.:face-icon-small-fro

Sorry, had to say it. Still love the pro.
 
This article applys as well. Part of the increased profit was the removal of 460 employees. Read.

I continue to read about this everyday. Large companies taking advantage of the masses. Oil companies showing record profits when many can hardly justify driving to work anymore because of the cost of fuel.

Polaris does not represent the customer. They certainly made that clear.They are here solely for the stockholder. So they will sell a sub par product. As so many of you have seen, there is no one there for the consumer. The people that helped generate those big numbers. Where is Mr. Wise when the customers improperly assembled sled is just sitting there dead? No support and no help to fix it. But hey, thanks for contributing to our stock fund.
 
What nerve thay have printing something like this after the D8 incident! All I can say is WOW!
Wonder how many people spent 19% of their anual income fixing these POS'S?
 
Well buy there stock, its symbol is PII ,$80.00 a share and pays a .45 cents per share dividend.
Look the warrenty on the d8 could not be handled any worst, its a $hitty way to run a company. But remember its a Public company, its sole purpose is in fact to make money for its shareholders,period. Quite simply no profit for shareholders,they go to another company and there is no polaris anymore.
Buy some stock,go the shareholders meetings and let um have it. Sucks but the bean counters and lawyers run the companies in America right now. Would they make more profit by doing the right thing and fixing the motors in the long run ? Well the a$$holes running the show in there infinite wisdom I guess say NO Sucks.... :face-icon-small-fro:face-icon-small-fro


oh btw I do not and due to this issue will not be buying any Polaris stock, I still believe they would make more $$$$ by doing the right thing
 
Last edited:
Profit sharing is a vague term...in large companies it isnt always (not sure how Poo does it) just based on Profit. Many times in publically traded companies it is set on an arbitrary growth number that they have to hit. These numbers are agreed on by Board of Directors and Senior Executive Staff.

My Company(fortune100 company) made our numbers this year by a lot..yet the payout was only 2.5% of base Salary.

Other years they had a pipe dream and we missed it by only .5% and they said go pound sand. Corporate America at its finest.

Back to Poo.....Good for the employees who probably do the best they can for what they get paid. Hmmm I wonder who was putting on the foam seals for the Air intake areas...fire that person. I hope the Pros are better in the regard.

Scott Wines Salary for one year is worth more than all our IQ sleds combined!
 
Some good things here. Rewarding employees and stockholders is a great thing no matter how you slice it. They laid employees off? Yeah, almost all companies did in the last few years. It was an eye opener to the realization that most companies ran a bloated business. It's also good to hear that Polaris is doing well depsite all the experts here on the 4M that suggested they would go belly up.

As far as the D8 issue is concerned, they did warranty them for the full warranty term. They did an update and provided extra service for units that haven't gone down (mapping). I had a D8 and had good luck with them. Two of my brothers had D8's go down and they are dealing with it. Polaris knew it was a problem and moved on to a new platform that has been successful. What should they have done? Given everyone's money back? Maybe a trade in incentive would be nice but most people would be pissed about that too. I can name countless product issues from other manufacturer's that were handled much worse.
 
When I walk out the door of my dealer 13.4K lighter in the pocket with a 3 year warrenty I expect that if there is an inhearent problem with there product it will be addressed and corrected. That means even if the warrenty runs out! The problem was there under warrenty and was never properly corrected or addressed so the liability should land squarly on the manufacurer to make the product right. If a company can simply strech it out untill the warrenty is up and then wash there hands of the product there is no point in having the warrenty in the first place. There is no way I will be buying a new sled from anyone until it has a couple years of rider R&D on it again, and if manufacturers continue to screw the customer(yes poo & doo I am speaking to you) I will spend my coin elswhere.

Sorry, rant over:scared:
 
When I walk out the door of my dealer 13.4K lighter in the pocket with a 3 year warrenty I expect that if there is an inhearent problem with there product it will be addressed and corrected. That means even if the warrenty runs out! The problem was there under warrenty and was never properly corrected or addressed so the liability should land squarly on the manufacurer to make the product right. If a company can simply strech it out untill the warrenty is up and then wash there hands of the product there is no point in having the warrenty in the first place. There is no way I will be buying a new sled from anyone until it has a couple years of rider R&D on it again, and if manufacturers continue to screw the customer(yes poo & doo I am speaking to you) I will spend my coin elswhere.

Sorry, rant over:scared:

Maybe you should wait a couple years before buying a first year model product then. I've done that before with cars/trucks....never, never buy the first year of a new model/re-design until some real world application reviews/data come thru. On another matter discussed previously... Consumer behavior drives company behavior in the mostly (not completely) free market system we have. If enough people go in a different direction from Polaris to other options it will be noticed by the bean counters....trust me...with the data out there that Polaris can buy from 3rd party vendors about consumer behavior they know what is going on from a macro level and make decisions accordingly.
 
You can justify polaris's poor quality with all the business school lingo jingo you want...the fact remains that if polaris management chooses to pay out bonuses, profit sharing and dividends RATHER THAN invest in engine management technology, engineering depth and enhanced, more robust testing regimes, then so be it.

But the problem isn't with consumers at the macro level.....it;s under the hood of their snowmobiles.
 
Maybe you should wait a couple years before buying a first year model product then. I've done that before with cars/trucks....never, never buy the first year of a new model/re-design until some real world application reviews/data come thru. On another matter discussed previously... Consumer behavior drives company behavior in the mostly (not completely) free market system we have. If enough people go in a different direction from Polaris to other options it will be noticed by the bean counters....trust me...with the data out there that Polaris can buy from 3rd party vendors about consumer behavior they know what is going on from a macro level and make decisions accordingly.

I think that is what I said
 
Starfire you just made my point....it's not lingo jingo....go buy another sled if you don't like the Polaris product. No one is forcing you to do anything (i.e. shelling out 10k for a sled with 800 motor/known problems). What goes around comes around for any company and if Polaris thinks it can get away with consistently bad products and service for a period of time that will come back to bite them at some point. Polaris is obviously still very popular and makes other good products/motors (like my 07 600 CFI switchback). Since when are profits/success a bad thing? I'm not very old but from what I understand there was a time in this country when everyone aspired to copy success if done the right way rather than the now popular cultural view of cutting people/business down to size for success in order to spread the wealth around.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top