Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Plugging Exhaust Valve Help

OnlyPolaris

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
I tried using the search as I know there are lots of topics on this but could not find the info I needed. I plugged the exhaust valves individually on my 2010 800 rmk. I was running the stock orange springs. Right off the bat I new it wouldn't work as i had a terrible stumble and i couldn't pull up rpm's. Next time out I switched out to the pink springs and and the sled responded alot better but around 7000 rpm I had a sort of miss. If I let off the throttle and got back into it, it would be fine. I am running 10-68 weights for my alltitude and have no runnability issues with the hoses unplugged. Do I need to go to an even lighter spring? and if so what color would that be? From what i can find either blue or purple is the next lighter.
 
What altitude are you at? 10-68 wts tell me you must be close to sea level. Is your peak RPM unchanged?

If your sled was working with the orange springs before it should work even better with them now. Most people go from orange to pink as you have when they go up in altitude. Extremely high altitude and you would run a yellow VES spring.

The first thing that comes to mind is a leaky bellow or for some reason they aren't sealed off completely.
 
we ride right around 1000ft. the peak rpm did not change any. if the valves are not plugged with the orange springs in the sled runs awesome. If i plug them the sled runs like crap right from engagement. so i put the pink springs in and its better but i get that mis around 7000rpm. so i was thinking of going to an even lighter spring. I had found a chart that you posted a while back and it looks like blue is the next step lighter from pink, then purple, then yellow. The bellows and everything looked good when i switched out the springs. and the gaskets are not leaking any.
 
My .02 is that this doesn't work for everyone. I can't make it work correctly so I leave them plugged in stock. Never had a miss or sputter with them using the vac lines..?
 
This has been very curious to me as we have only ever had a couple of people say it didn't work for them. Another possibility is that your current fuel mapping cannot compensate for the valves opening earlier. I'm hoping Kraven will chime in on this one.

Plugging the valves doesn't do anything more than allow them to function like the original 03-05 VES. Typical result is that accelleration and throttle response improves from the valves ability open and recover sooner.

My motivation was to get them to open earlier so more heat could escape from around the exhaust port. This is a critical area where scoring usually occurs on these motors.
 
ya hopefully kraven can give some insight.

If you have a PC-3 or 5 try ADDING FUEL in the area where it stumbles.

For whatever reason, most guys plug 'em and they're good to go.

Then there's a few with Gremlins???

My bud's D7 is a little LEAN in the mid-range to begin with, NO fuel controller, we plugged the valves and it's more responsive on bottom end, and the mid-range was about the same, been runnin' it plugged for 2+ seasons now.
 
If your sled runs awesome with them unplugged, what's the advantage of plugging them?:face-icon-small-con

1) Faster response on bottom and mid-range and

2) delaying the valves from opening, holding exhaust heat in, can't be a good thing the way I see it
 
I plugged my exhaust valves hoses before my ride yesterday and noticed a HUGE difference in the my throttle response. Much more snappy feeling. I did also have a new helix in my sled so I'm sure I was noticing that also but I could tell that the throttle response was much better.

I'm sure you are completely aware of what you are doing but make sure you actually plugged the hoses. I saw a guy up on the trail a few weeks ago that couldn't figure his out and it was because he put a coupler between the hoses instead of a bolt/block.

Probably isn't the problem in your case but I figured I'd point out the obvious first. Also did you clean your valves? Mine were pretty gross with 2000 miles on my sled. I believe you are supposed to clean them every 500 miles.
 
I was all for this mod until I read some things on DTR's reports. Kraven is 100% correct, in that you have to ensure you are matching the fuel curve to the opening of the valves. The airflow actually drops as the valves open, and the ECU in turn is programmed to cut fuel to match the drop in airflow. If the valve lines are plugged off, and therefore open earlier, the ECU thinks the valves are opening (and therefore expecting a drop in airflow) and cuts fuel to match....however, what really happens is NO drop in airflow, but there IS a drop in fuel, therefore the motor is now lean during the ECU valve transition. I would guess that the stumble at 7000 when on/off the throttle is actually a rich missfire condition due to the valve closing early from a drop in cylinder pressure.

On the non-efi models, the carb jets would deliver fuel "on demand", and were not subject to this valve opening transition fuel delivery problem.

We REALLY need a closed loop EFI on these sleds....too many variables to ensure consistency with a "one map fits all" mentality, IMO.
 
sled has 150 miles on it so no i didn't clean the valves. I am running a pcv with the dtr stock map. I am heading to the mountains on thusday so we will see if a higher elevation makes a difference. if not i can unplug them quickly on the hill.
 
hmmm...

So is it safe to run your sled with ves plugged if you are not using a fuel controller. Mine seemed to run great but my sled has been very dependable with them left stock.

Will plugging the ves cause a lean runner without re mapping the efi?
 
According to the reading I did today, it's definitely a possibility that you plug the hoses and develop a transitory lean spot in the fuel curve. The BEST way to know for sure, is to tune it with A/F readings and build a map accordingly (like using the Autotune with the PC5).
 
Valves plugged and the April flash does not work. At least it did not work for me. These sleds seem so random it is hard to generalize but I suffered a major loss in low end responsiveness. My sled would almost bog and build rpm's very slowly and run fine on the top end. Only changes were the switch to the April flash and DTR April PCV map.

After a few checks (belt,valves,compression,TPS) I decided to hook the solenoid back up and I have a new sled again. Throttle response is crisp and the motor winds up fine. No other changes. I am not sure why this had such and effect but it did. For some reason when I whacked the throttle the valves were opening and killing the bottom end. Maybe the springs are sacked out but I had no issues prior to the re-flash and the sled only has 2500 miles on it.
 
PLUGGED EXHAUST VALVES

I was all for this mod until I read some things on DTR's reports. Kraven is 100% correct, in that you have to ensure you are matching the fuel curve to the opening of the valves. The airflow actually drops as the valves open, and the ECU in turn is programmed to cut fuel to match the drop in airflow. If the valve lines are plugged off, and therefore open earlier, the ECU thinks the valves are opening (and therefore expecting a drop in airflow) and cuts fuel to match....however, what really happens is NO drop in airflow, but there IS a drop in fuel, therefore the motor is now lean during the ECU valve transition. I would guess that the stumble at 7000 when on/off the throttle is actually a rich missfire condition due to the valve closing early from a drop in cylinder pressure.

On the non-efi models, the carb jets would deliver fuel "on demand", and were not subject to this valve opening transition fuel delivery problem.

We REALLY need a closed loop EFI on these sleds....too many variables to ensure consistency with a "one map fits all" mentality, IMO.

On the bold, agreed.

Auto-tune + PC-5 is as close as we can get for now. Only the FST -WEBER 4-stroke has the closed loop as far as I know.

With respect to DYNO TECH RESEARCH (Jim's comments) he was referring to the INCONSISTENCY in the timing of the opening of the exhaust valves possibly affecting the fuel curves (and his revised PC-5 maps) on the 800's, which then of course yet another PC-5 map would have to be created in addition to the maps he has for what is it now 5 + re-flashes with enough dates to fill up the calendar, and then different maps (for the corresponding re-flash dates of course) for SLP piped sleds, maps for Bikeman piped sleds, and Dyno-Port piped sleds..........etc.

Just to clarify, Jim offered this "inconsistent exhaust valve opening" as a possible explanation as to why the same PC-5 maps sent out to different customers on identical sleds performed so differently. Some ran great, others had the deto light on 1/2 the time, etc....

Jim went on further to suggest a electronic servo motor to control the exhaust valves for the sake of consistency, similar to the system POLARIS used on the 1997-2000 PRO-785 Jet-Ski where the computer had cables coming out of it that controlled the opening of the valves on a triple piped triple 785 FUJI engine.

Casey Mullins, a DynoTechResearch regular, has the valves plugged on his 800 for quite some time now, that should tell you something.

In summary, for less time than it takes to read this thread, anyone can simply test this idea by bringing a couple of mini-vise grips with them out on the trail. Pinch off the hoses, take it for a ride, if it works, GREAT, if not, and one doesn't want to fiddle with different springs or dialing in the fuel controller, remove the vice grips, and it's cost you nothing.

Don't you wish the same could be said of all the after-market HI-ZOOT stuff everyone has probably paid a lot of $$$$$$$$$ for and provided no performance benefit what-so-ever?

This fall, I may be taking a road trip and bringing some of my toys to DTR for some dyno-testing, and I'll be sure to post the info. One of the changes will be to test both the plugged and unplugged version of the exhaust valves, and see how the A/F is affected by doing so.

I know how my 700 and my bud's 700 runs before and after plugging the valves. They'll both stay plugged.

And since I'm not selling a $29.95 exhaust valve plug kit, I have no motivation to B.S. here.

*****************************************************************************************************

My theory on the inconsistency between CFI sleds is the 3 different color/flow rate injectors and let's color match it with a different E.C.U. game.

All other brands have one size injector for that set-up and one E.C.U.fuel map.

On the modded engines, they just replace let's say a 38 lb (pounds of fuel per hour) with a 42, 48, etc.

POLARIS must have purchased a Train Car car load of injectors manufactured in a sweat shop in some Third World Country, and after testing them found such a HUGE variance between them, and in a cost savings corporate decision, they had to figure out a way to use them up, hence the 3 different codes and E.C.U. colors. Un-friggin-belivable.
 
Last edited:
I know one of the "fixes" posted on here had a dyno sheet that showed valves opening around 4500rpm. I think it's safe to say they were plugged as well.

I was finally able to do some messing around with the auto tune last week. Just 10 minutes of riding and you can see some big changes in the range of 4500-5500 rpm. Almost 20%. Obviously where the valves are opening. I also chose to enable the accelerator pump feature as this seemed to work well with the SLP map. I think it can better accommodate the quick opening of the valves.

This is a big change from them opening at 6800-7200 rpm. Not only are you now dealing with a larger port height, but you are also dealing with instantanious response from the valves themselves. It is pretty easy to see that for some sleds the stock mapping may not be able to compensate for this.
 
Last edited:
I agree with both Kraven and Monte. My inference from the information DTR provided on the inconsistency of the valves' opening came from the drop in airflow at the time of the actual opening. Since the computer adjusts fuel flow to compensate, then having the user change the RPM the valves open must also be matched with a fuel curve (from a fuel programmer) that makes up for the drop in airflow at a different RPM, AND now compensates further for the disappearance of the drop in airflow (and fuel) when the solenoid closes (different RPM).

If the motors are having a hard time compensating correctly when the computer controls the opening of the exhaust valves, how can we expect it to manage when we take that valve control away from the ECU? The only way to consistently and accurately manage this is to also manage the compensation, which means add a fuel programmer with THE CORRECT FUEL CURVE to compensate.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top