Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Oil spill dejavu'

Yah, that is completely ridiculous... Honestly, I have 0 sympathy for any of the oil companies.
 
I don't think they are looking for sympathy....they didn't want this to happen and want it to stop as bad as anyone. Big spills tend to be bad for business but are a known risk. Most anything worthwhile involves risk.
 
I don't think they are looking for sympathy....they didn't want this to happen and want it to stop as bad as anyone. Big spills tend to be bad for business but are a known risk. Most anything worthwhile involves risk.

In this example, it seems the risk was much much more then just BP potential losses. It will be interesting to see how the company is able put a dollar amount on the ecological damage it has and is causing.
 
I think we'll still be talking about this in another year, maybe 5.... 10 years from now anyone that gets cancer in that region will be suing BP over the chemicals used....this will be dragged out for 20 years. What a mess :face-icon-small-dis
 
Don't you think it funny that no foreign countries have been allowed to help? could it be the prez denied the offers to put more pressure on cap a trade legislation? makes you wonder.......
 
Don't you think it funny that no foreign countries have been allowed to help? could it be the prez denied the offers to put more pressure on cap a trade legislation? makes you wonder.......

Who's gonna help? The Brits? We've already got their top people in this department working on it (BP).

Who do YOU think can add to this endeavor and get it stopped sooner?

I agree 100% with winterbrew...BP wants this stopped just as fast as everyone else.
 
well all i know is that i am just so sad over the whole ordeal...its tear jerking..and no end in sight..i just really wish there was an answer...but i think we are in for a wait..i think of the 4 minute mile being broken decades ago...a man on the moon..space rovers on mars...and we are held hostage one mile underwater..???..i guess we should have learned to walk before we flew..
 
Who do YOU think can add to this endeavor and get it stopped sooner?

QUOTE]

well i know im going to get flamed for this...but i think you can almost take anybody with an IQ above their shoe size and they would have had a practical fix by now..me i would have tryed inserting a deflated long bladder part way down the pipe and inflated it...we are only dealing with a 20 inch pipe...we use a version to isolate an open end pipe to close other piping systems to be able to pressure test..we use a small elongulated bladder that easily is inserted in a three inch pipe as far as we desire and we inflate it and it seals tight and holds any air pressure test we throw at it..i just think it would work in a version applicable to this issue..but this is not in an oil field enviroment procedure so its probably not even a thought as they probably work within their certain industry parimeters ...
 
History has shown the only way to stop this leak is by relief wells. Those pressures at those depths are beyond imagination. Not to disount the bladder suggestion but look you have to fish this thing through 5000 ft of water, the head pressure alone at the pipe is 12000 psi not to mention the 18000 feet of pipe below the surface of the water on a 21in pipe funnelling (pushing) the oil up out of the res against this pressure is tremendous. They tried pumping (top Kill) with a 30000HP pump pushing 80 barrells of mud a min down that hole and could not over come the pressure of the oil coming up. IN FACT they were worrried the they may have put to much pressure on the pipe and may have compromised it slightly. Sooo putting that bladder in inflating it holding the oil back sounds good but run a huge risk that probably will show no better results than other methods. Lets just hope they get those wells drilled as quickly as possible. WE ALL want the oil to stop.
 
Who do YOU think can add to this endeavor and get it stopped sooner?

QUOTE]

well i know im going to get flamed for this...but i think you can almost take anybody with an IQ above their shoe size and they would have had a practical fix by now..me i would have tryed inserting a deflated long bladder part way down the pipe and inflated it...we are only dealing with a 20 inch pipe...we use a version to isolate an open end pipe to close other piping systems to be able to pressure test..we use a small elongulated bladder that easily is inserted in a three inch pipe as far as we desire and we inflate it and it seals tight and holds any air pressure test we throw at it..i just think it would work in a version applicable to this issue..but this is not in an oil field enviroment procedure so its probably not even a thought as they probably work within their certain industry parimeters ...


When this first happened, I was thinking of something similar and expected something similar to be tried.
Then I did more research on the conditions and capabilities of the submersibles....the pressure of the oil is somewhere around 7,000PSI!!! There is nothing "solid" to work from to be able to force something into the pipe to overcome that type of pressure. It would be almost impossible even on land.
Imagine even trying to plug a garden hose (50psi) at the bottom of a swimming pool with nothing but a little remote control submarine and a video monitor....it would be next to impossibe.
I do think they could use that flange beneath the leak and make something that could clamp below the flange and then have a series of relief valves and a tube to the surface similar to what they are using now, but extends farther down so it will be more secure.
They have some pretty sharp guys working on this.....if there IS a workable solution they will find it.
 
I really have a hard time looking at the time lapse that has taken place without suspecting the government of taking advantage of another disaster. I suspect there are some in government that thought letting this thing play out a month or so would be good for some pending legislation ... and then when things got out of hand, their ineptness sort of took over.

BP also has a recent history with the powers to be in our government. Whether they went along or are being used will be open for a lot of speculation.

I believe the president has no control over the situation (whether that is by choice or by proxy) and is absolutely the wrong man for the job.

Just like when 911 happened and the our country gave that collective sigh of relief that Gore wasn't in control, most are now probably wishing that Bush was around to get us out of this mess (besides, would have been better for the media to pin the blame on him).

I pray our country can survive two and a half more years of the kind of leadership we have now. But I can pretty much promise you ... it's going to leave a mark.
 
this oilspill is used as an argument not to drill for oil outside the coast of Lofoten here in Norway. guess we cant come in on the UNESCO world inheritage list if we let some development happend. from before we're on the national tourist-road list, so we cant widen our roads. They must be the way they are (6 meters and narrower)
 
In this example, it seems the risk was much much more then just BP potential losses. It will be interesting to see how the company is able put a dollar amount on the ecological damage it has and is causing.

To start off, I think this whole oil spill deal really, really sucks for everyone. It's a huge and complete disaster.
But people say, "the risks aren't worth it". These will be the same people yelling the loudest if gas prices would sour because they stop all off shore drilling altogether. And they are the same people yelling to stop our dependance on foreign oil. This is why these off shore rigs are drilled, to help stop the dependance. And of course they plan on making money LOTS of money. Like was said, there are some smart people working on the cleanup. It's easy to judge sitting behind a keyboard. Unfortunately, I'm guessing the risks are worth it.
 
Would we rather face something like this every 30 years (as the pattern seems to be)..or have to pay higher fuel prices all the time....and anything else made from oil :face-icon-small-dis
 
Would we rather face something like this every 30 years (as the pattern seems to be)..or have to pay higher fuel prices all the time....and anything else made from oil :face-icon-small-dis
My point exactly.
If anything we should be mad at Big Oil for not having a better disaster plan together. Because if history has though us anything, spills are gonna happen no matter how careful we are.

Unfortunately, I'm sure there are alot out there who strongly disagree.
 
Last edited:
But people say, "the risks aren't worth it". These will be the same people yelling the loudest if gas prices would sour because they stop all off shore drilling altogether.
I am yelling to stop drilling in the ocean if they can't do it safely, and I don't scream if gas prices would increase, actually I think they should increase. As to soar, I don't think so.

It is estimated that 1.4-7.2x108 barrels of petroleum and 4.4-22.3x1010 cubic meters of natural gas are present beneath the seafloor in the northern Gulf (Darnell and Defenbaugh, 1990). According to the Minerals Management Service, offshore operations in the Gulf produce a quarter of the U.S. domestic natural gas and one-eighth of its oil. In addition, the offshore petroleum industry employs over 55,000 U.S. workers in the Gulf (MMS, 2002). In Mexico, the Secretariat of Energy (Secretaria de Energia - SENER) estimated that the daily crude oil and natural gas production from Gulf of Mexico offshore operations in the years 2000 to 2005 ranged from 2.293 to 2.839 million barrels and 41.4 to 44.8 million cubic meters, respectively (SENER 2006).
Some stats on oil production by location..

Some more stats..

The gulf coast produces about 268 thousand barrels per day. The total oil production is 85,472 thousand barrels per day. The gulf coast represents only 0.314% of all oil production. It seems nothing would really happen if the gulf coast stopped producing oil. Well, we would be importing more..

And they are the same people yelling to stop our dependance on foreign oil.
I yell that, well sort of. foreign oil or our own oil. They are the same exact thing, and the price will always be the same too. They are sold on the market, there is no difference between the price.

This is why these off shore rigs are drilled, to help stop the dependance.
:face-icon-small-con:face-icon-small-sho So a foreign company is drilling in the gulf of mexico to help limit our dependence on foreign oil? The problem is and always has been our dependence on oil. It doesn't matter where it comes from...
 
Last edited:
Premium Features



Back
Top