Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=5380098Your link doesn't work, well at least not for me. But the Avalung has been around for a couple years now, just not really ideal for sledders because your helmet prevents you from getting the tube in your mouth.
when i did that partial avalanche course there last year the instructor highly recomended getting one of the avalungs and i was going to buy one considering its quite a bit cheaper then the air bag. it makes sense but so does one inch tubing ran to the back of your pack sack would do a similar affect.
It's not a new idea, but has mostly been marketed at the ski industry since Black Diamond makes them. I wouldn't compare prices on justifying one over the other. They serve completely different purposes. Weigh the benefits of each and make each an individual choice, not a comparison. With tubing you would still be breathing in your exhaled air; avalungs take air in from the front and exhale it at the back.
I personally wear an avalung and once the airbags have been tested more in the field with people i will be buying one of those too.
I've heard that when you are buried, the snow sets up so hard that you can't expand your ribcage to inhale anyways....
saw them test the avalung 3 yrs ago on discovery channel. they buried a woman and had her all hooked up to monitor core temp, heart rate, etc. and she remained buried for 10 hrs until she asked to get out. built a similar system into my jacket, just a food grade rubber hose with a rubber bite block on the end. if you could get it in your mouth in time, it would definitely increase the amount of time one would survive buried under the snow. it'll have to do until I can afford an ABS pack.when i did that partial avalanche course there last year the instructor highly recomended getting one of the avalungs and i was going to buy one considering its quite a bit cheaper then the air bag. it makes sense but so does one inch tubing ran to the back of your pack sack would do a similar affect.
I don't know witch air bag you are looking at, but the ABS backpack has been used in Europe for the last 20 odd years with a 98% survival rate.
If you try the 1" tube idea remember that you have to alternate your inhale and exhale.
In other words you could breathe in through the tube and exhale through your nose, just not back through the tube.
It is your own CO2 that Kills you, not the lack of oxygen in the snow.
The Avalung has a one way valve in it that closes for exhale and thereby sepreating by distance the area you are receiving oxygen and the area you are exhaling CO2.
Allowing you to take better advantage of the available oxygen in the snow.
if you have an avalung, wouldn't you put it in your mouth BEFORE doing any big pulls, cause there's NO way you'd be able to do it once the avy had started!!!!!I'll bet even Monica Lewinsky could not get that tube in her mouth after being caught up in an avalanche. Put on yer helmet, balaclava and whatever else would be in the way and jump in the clothes dryer and try it out!!!
It's not a new idea, but has mostly been marketed at the ski industry since Black Diamond makes them. I wouldn't compare prices on justifying one over the other. They serve completely different purposes. Weigh the benefits of each and make each an individual choice, not a comparison. With tubing you would still be breathing in your exhaled air; avalungs take air in from the front and exhale it at the back.
I personally wear an avalung and once the airbags have been tested more in the field with people i will be buying one of those too.