Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Maybe the next recall?

Teth-Air

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
So with 940 miles on my friends 163 Pro here is what he found. There are 2 more with the same problem on Snow and Mud 4M.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RalfcZJ8mPg


I can't understand how the Quickdrive has not failed unless the whole backer plate is moving?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yup, this one was rattling for 300 miles and he could not locate it until it got worse. Or the heat caused the grease to run out of the bearing?
 
So I lost my first day of sleddin because of this thread lol.

I pulled my drive system apart ('bin thinking about grease at 850 miles anyway and I wanted to find out why my top pulley bolt doesn't stay torqued). First I want to say, everytime I get into this Poo I am impressed with the quality of parts and excellent design.
Every bearing is NTN from Japan (and standard sizes). The jackshaft is light (with quite a lot of work in it's design) and very strong. Those 2 things alone are much different from my last sled.
To pull it apart was as simple as take off both belts, the secondary, and 3 bolts for the clutch side bearing cup and out it came. Doesn't get any simpler. Under 30 min. first attempt.
I even found a piece (the 3 nuts attached to a bracket for the bearing cup thingy) where Poo welded steel to aluminum lol. How do they do that?

Here's what I found.
First, I removed the belts, pulley and secondary. I thought i noticed a bit of a "sprong" as I unbolted the pulley so I kept that in the back of my mind. I spun the jackshaft and it was a smooth as silk. I might not even grease it I thought.
Then i pulled off my glasses and had a closer look and I saw the jackshaft spinning but not the bearing (QD side). Hmm.
Started poking in deeper and found a couple of little concerns. First the top of the "QD plate" is not very rigid on it's own. It needs to be torqued sold to the jackshaft to have any strength.
Second, on mine I needed to push in quite a bit to get the bearing to bottom on the machined bearing stop on the jackshaft. This design needs the inner bearing race to be secured to the jackshaft through torque on the ends or the shaft will spin and not the bearing.
Third, I think Poo's glue guns are getting old. My QD plate is unglued in spots and the glue feels like old gum. I looked at the bolt design and figure it will be a summer project to reglue. Not concerned at this point in time.

So I pull the jackshaft to look for galling on the shaft or bearing. Found a bit of discoloration on both. Bearing showed it had been secured slightly cocked for the last bit of time. Micrometered both and compared to a new 6205 I have in stock lol. Not enough difference for me to measure but there is no interference fit here. They are both (jackshaft OD and bearing ID) equal as close as I can measure (1/2 thouish).
I did retorque my top pulley bolt twice (once about 150 miles and once around 300 miles) and I do believe if i had not done this I would have seen extensive galling on the shaft.

So proceded to reassemble with a bit of "blueprinting". The bearing looked and felt fine. Maybe a C3 clearance now lol but I just regreased and left it.
I needed to make a 55 thou. shim for the jackshft to fit my QD plate position. I could have shimed either end of the shaft but picked the QD side. It has to be a special "homemade" shim because of the large radius at the bearing stop. So I chucked up a "close" shim and lathed it to fit.
Now when I bolted in my jackshaft it just touched the QD plate bearing as that plate fits in my sled BEFORE torquing up the pulley bolt.
I cleaned the surfaces and re-assembled using sleeve retainer high heat locktite between the bearing and the shaft and retorgued it to a tight position using some sleeves and a bolt to let it set. I don't know if this is necessary but it made me feel better lol.

Then I took my glasses off again to see why this happened on my sled. Many systems use the torque on the inner race to lock in the bearing. Nothing wrong with that but it cannot lose it's torque.
What I found with mine was the disc brake (it`s the sleeve-spacer between the bearing and pulley also) slowly had ever so slightly been mushrooming into the bearing. You could just see and feel the radius of the inner bearing race on that side. So even though it was only a 1/8th turn of lost torque it is enough to allow the shaft to spin in the bearing. You could also see movement had been happening on the wave washer and pulley surfaces the disc and washer contact.
I centered the disc on the splines and lathed off .60 thou. off the bearing side and 30 off the pulley side and replaced these distances with shims. This gives me much more contact surface to torque against the bearing. I also replaced the wave washer with a thicker flat washer so I could see if it comes loose easier and give me more contact surface to torque against too.

IMO Poo could improve this area with a few simple changes. Add a thou to the OD of the jackshaft, a little stronger plate or a couple of fasteners at the top of the tunnel, maybe a little handfitting in this area to shim jackshafts during production lol, better controls on the glue guys lol, or two birds with one stone; Make a hardened sleeve to fit between the bearing and pulley and let the disc FLOAT on that sleeve.

Moral of this story; check your top pulley bolts boys. Check them twice.
 
IMG_0139.jpg


This is what my jackshaft looked like upon removal. The above video is also my sled. We noticed there was no snap ring holding the bearing in but that had nothing to do with the failure.
 
jh Did you mean no snapring on the QD plate? 'Cause there is no snap ring on the shaft or one needed there.
Was your bearing still all there? Did the tech order you a new brake rotor? What has Poo's reply been?
 
Yo...geo... I'm stopping by your shop on my way to Revy!!!

Great write up and description.


.
 
Wow. I'm just an anal sledder lol.

Pm me MH. Give me time to pick up some steaks and wine.
 
I read in a different post that both the top and bottom pulley bolt(s) are 30ft. lbs. Iis this accurate/correct?

If yes, I checked both of mine and they were tight and had no slop on the brake rotor side of the jack shaft. I also indexed them with a marker when new and they have not loosened a bit.

-John
 
Just an update. Johnny (the guy who owns the sled in the video) got the sled fixed by the dealer. (good quick service) and was on the snow the next day. Unfortunately they would not replace the Quick drive belt becasue it still looked good. Well I had to go up on Bolder (Revy) late on Friday night to rescue him because his belt failed on the first ride. (3 teeth remain and would not move)

I then checked the bolts on my 2 machines. The 800 163 upper bolt was 1 full turn loose and the 600 155 was almost 1/2 turn loose.

About 1000 kms on both.
 
JL; I don't think it is the bolt coming loose as much as extra clearance occuring. IMO the disc is working a little loose from use. Also the wave washer barely flattens with the recommended torque and the thin outer inside edge starts to wear in it's own place also.
This is not rattle loose just enough extra clearance for the torque on the inner race to release.
I think you need to loosen and retorque to check. This also a good time (when bolt is loose) to push in on the top of the plate to see how much movement until the bearing contacts the stop on the jackshaft. A little is OK but I believe excessive movement creates a side load on the bearing.

TA; I double checked on my first ride 'cause I was wondering about "rebreak-in" lol (but I caught mine early). Also I wanted to see if it got rid of the heat. I didn't ride any different just checked more.
First ride i think there may have been more heat (maybe bearing re-centering it's "groove" maybe me worry lol)). Second ride back to the same as before but,,, it might have felt (unscientific) a bit "less hot".
Fourth ride, after an excessively fast ride down as always, I opened my cover to pack on some snow and the top pulley was about the same as the lower pulley. That's a first since I've ridden this sled. I then touched my disc (cause I used it lots). Ouch lol (how old am I? lol).
It didn't take long to feel the heat sink into the pulley from the disc but one handful of snow was more than it needed to cool everything off.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top