C
Cascades34
Well-known member
I don't mean this to be accusatory but what is the honest financial support our public land access interests are recieving from the big manufactures. This question is across the board for all makers of powersports equipment. Unless you ride MX or own a giant ranch, seems like we all need OPEN, public land. I'm not talking about throwing a couple grand to a state snowmobile or motorcycle club but bigtime lawyers and bigtime lobbyists. Our version of the NRA.
It seems like every great riding area is under threat of being closed. These companies have money, Polaris' stock has gone through the roof the last few years. What is each companies honest contribution to our cause? Maybe it should be more. Or, if there are those that are doing more than others, I'd just assume support them. After all, if my local backcountry and single track is closed, I don't need a $13,000 skidoo, a $9,000 ktm, or a $15,000 RZR. I can find cheaper ways to piss off liberals.
It seems like every great riding area is under threat of being closed. These companies have money, Polaris' stock has gone through the roof the last few years. What is each companies honest contribution to our cause? Maybe it should be more. Or, if there are those that are doing more than others, I'd just assume support them. After all, if my local backcountry and single track is closed, I don't need a $13,000 skidoo, a $9,000 ktm, or a $15,000 RZR. I can find cheaper ways to piss off liberals.