Why nobody is doing longer, 146-154in?
It should help not to dig in steep uphills...
It should help not to dig in steep uphills...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would take a lot of fun out of the bike. Your setup would be longer than a sled! Also, being able to hold third gear would climb better with the 137 inch track Than having to shift down to second with the 154.
The whole point of a snowbike is a nimble, easy to maneuver machine. Everything you are asking about is why most snowbikers left snowmobiles in the first place. My 120" Timbersled goes anywhere and everywhere I need it to and I wouldn't go longer if it was free. Sounds like you need to go back to a sled!
On the flats - yes, 120 is enough. In the steap mountains - I need max climbing ability. Not everywhere there is a place to side-hill.
Sled? Are joking? I never even tried the sled. I got the snowbike directly.
I am going to buy another one for my father (he is 65). Cannot find another Husaberg 570, will take Honda CR500 and a 137×15in track...
Your best options are the 2020 Yeti 129FR or 2020 Timbersled ARO3.
So the question to ask is can your bike spool up the track when it's needed ? or does it matter ?
The length of the track was limited by the ponies of the machine at one time , for some reason that line of logic got thrown out the door . Even though the 600 sleds are pushing close to 130 ponies the longer track lengths offered can make them worthless in certain conditions . there just isn't enough throttle to spool up the track speed when needed .
So the question to ask is can your bike spool up the track when it's needed ? or does it matter ?