Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Kick em all out (politics)

seems I posted this somwhere else


it has come to my attention folks ...that you don't have to knock off the top layer of the cake for it to fall in on it's self ..........................

start at the bottom and eat your way up ..........
__________________
 
The problem is, everyone wants to replace every member of the house and senate, except their own.
They just want to replace everyone elses.
If they wanted to replace them all, they would start at home.
Look at colorado, we don't have one politician that has been in office more than a couple years except Degette and she's a flaming lib elected by the peoples republic of boulder.
 
Ollie, you were right, the media tide has turned and it is still August. Turn to MSNBC, they are are kicking the dog poop out of the white house over oil from Lybia and every other thing they can find this morning. When I turned it on Joe was saying " what did Obama know and when did he know it". I can hardly believe my ears. Now they are praising Reagan.
 
Ollie, you were right, the media tide has turned and it is still August. Turn to MSNBC, they are are kicking the dog poop out of the white house over oil from Lybia and every other thing they can find this morning. When I turned it on Joe was saying " what did Obama know and when did he know it". I can hardly believe my ears. Now they are praising Reagan.


Sure has taken long enuff!
Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson.


In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China.


George Bush Jr didn't fail so much as he was perceived to have been too much of a patrician while being uncomfortable with his more conservative allies. Yet George Bush Sr is still perceived as a man of uncommon decency, loyal to the enduring American character of rugged self-determination, free markets, and generosity. George W will eventually be treated more kindly by historians as one whose potential was squashed by his own compromise of conservative principles, in some ways repeating the mistakes of his father, while ignoring many lessons in executive leadership he should have learned at Harvard Business School. Of course George W could never quite overcome being dogged from the outset by half of the nation convinced he was electorally illegitimate -- thus aiding the resurgence of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party.


But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loath them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.


But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?


No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us. All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans. We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, Reagan.


But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, is historically illiterate, and woefully small minded for the size of the task-- all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.


In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us--financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job. Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."


Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.


Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.
 
I caught a little bit of McCains town hall meeting last week, he said that we are seeing the beginnings of a "peaceful revolution in the US".

People in that meeting were so concerned about the state of this country that there were tears when someone asked "what can WE do", "We want to help you do something about it but what can we do".

I still say we are going to see an "about face" from the people in there now that are up for re-election next year, just enough so that they will sway enough voters AGAIN to re-elect them and then it will business as usual.

It's too bad to see the Democrats on this power trip, most of them (the President being one of the most guilty) could care less about bi-partisanship. Maybe if they would together and come to a mutual agreement on things rather than it's our way or no way and sliding things through in 1,000+ page bills, there wouldn't be this anger and outrage. I hear all the time about meetings that O has on this health care bill and the people invited are all D's.... Get rid of the dam D & R and just elect freaking Americans!!!!
 
^^^^ Dude Great post! Yes BOTH partys go beyond sucking & are the real reason for Americas problems! Where are the TERM LIMITS we voted for & passed years ago?
 
^^^^ Dude Great post! Yes BOTH partys go beyond sucking & are the real reason for Americas problems! Where are the TERM LIMITS we voted for & passed years ago?

Politicians went to the Supreme Court and had em tossed out.

The problem isn't the Dem party as a whole, it is the entrenched politicians from both parties. If you want to get anything thru, you have to play ball with them.

Case in point is illegal immigration.
Both E-verify and the Save Act were introduced by Dems.
The leadership just won't make E-verity permanent because they want to use it for leverage against their own party and they won't allow the Save act to even come up for a vote because they want to grant amnesty so they can get those 20 million votes.

It is nice to FINALLY see the media turning on this clown.
I think you will see much more come out over the next couple months.
Bo is losing his own party. The Dems aren't stupid. They see the hand writing on the wall and know they are going to lose BIG time in 2010.
A lot of freshman Dems are positioning themselves to the moderate side of the dem party. They will be putting some distance between themselves and the ruling party to give themselves some wiggle room on the stuff they already voted on.

I am waiting.
I predicted the media would turn in Late June early July.
It didn't start till (lets just call it) september.

I will now go out on another limb and say expect to see impeachment proceeding by the fall of 2010.
 
When Poll #'s attack!

Politicians went to the Supreme Court and had em tossed out.

The problem isn't the Dem party as a whole, it is the entrenched politicians from both parties. If you want to get anything thru, you have to play ball with them.

Case in point is illegal immigration.
Both E-verify and the Save Act were introduced by Dems.
The leadership just won't make E-verity permanent because they want to use it for leverage against their own party and they won't allow the Save act to even come up for a vote because they want to grant amnesty so they can get those 20 million votes.

It is nice to FINALLY see the media turning on this clown.
I think you will see much more come out over the next couple months.
Bo is losing his own party. The Dems aren't stupid. They see the hand writing on the wall and know they are going to lose BIG time in 2010.
A lot of freshman Dems are positioning themselves to the moderate side of the dem party. They will be putting some distance between themselves and the ruling party to give themselves some wiggle room on the stuff they already voted on.

I am waiting.
I predicted the media would turn in Late June early July.
It didn't start till (lets just call it) september.

I will now go out on another limb and say expect to see impeachment proceeding by the fall of 2010.

I hope you are wrong about the fall of 2010 & hope it is sooner for the good of all of us!

More grim news for Obama from the Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll. The Net Approval (strongly approve minus strongly disapprove) index is minus 11. Overall, only 46% of the likely voters polled strongly or somewhat approve of Obama. AT political director Richard Baehr calls the chart below a "shockingly fast decline. It suggests this guy got elected because the stars were aligned, that plus 3/4 of a billion dollars and billions in free positive media coverage."


News editor Ed Lasky passes along this article by Jim McTague of Barrons, noting the damage that liberal Massachusetts is about the inflict on Obama, as the state appoints a Democrat to succeed Ted Kennedy in the Senate, necessitating a change in the state law that Kennedy engineered in order to assure a Democrat in the Senate the last a potential vacancy loomed with John Kerry running for President, with a Republican governor sitting in the State House on Beacon Hill.


Beacon Hill is a hotbed of delicious scandal. The national press will home in on the tawdry operation, presenting Democrats in Washington with a Category Five public-relations problem. The president, the Senate and Massachusetts political corruption all will be bound up in one sound bite. Journalists will remind us of the fiasco that ensued when Illinois Democrats hastily appointed Roland Burris to fill Obama's U.S. Senate seat. Burris faces a Senate ethics investigation for failing to disclose information about his relationship with former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who was indicted on federal corruption charges. This sort of publicity likely will harm Obama's already wobbly popularity numbers.


Ed Lasky has long predicted that Deval Patrick's record in liberal Massachusetts foreshadow the difficulties Obama will experience in office, with voters rapidly becoming disillusioned with the failure to keep the campaign promises engineered for both men by the campaign manager they shared, David Axelrod. McTague notes:


Patrick's popularity, like Obama's, is plunging. He's running for a second term in 2010, but a Boston Globe poll this summer found that only 23% of the voters trust Patrick's handling of the state's economic problems. A poll of 400 likely voters by the Rappaport Center for Law and Public Service at Suffolk University Law School in Boston found that 47% of them believe that ethics have worsened in state government over the past 10 years. Asked to rate the level of ethics, 2% said they were excellent; 10% said they were good; 49%, fair; and 40% said they were poor.


This is extraordinary. Massachusetts voters are strongly Democratic and historically very forgiving.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top