Hopefully, the new 2010 Arctic Cat M8 will prove to be a very reilable and legendary powerplant. I have all the faith in the world that this engine will be the one to beat in the mountains this upcoming winter.
In speaking to SLP technicians, they have mentioned when asked, that the 2010 Arctic Cat M8 engine looks an awful lot like their perfomance edition modifiication on the inside (except for the crank changes). Several of the SLP techs told me that the reliability of their performance edition package was unbelievable, even to them! In fact, they said SLP did not know of ANY of these packages that have ever failed. That sounds like B.S. but, they haven't lied to me (that I know of) yet. They have also told me repeatedly that yes, there is more performance to be harvested from the Arctic Cat 800 engine than we squeeze out of our performance edition package, but they have found that it comes with a reliability cost. So, they feel their performance edition package is right in the sweet spot between power gain and reliability.
I have heard that sleds with RKT setups make even more horsepower than the SLP kit and I have heard many good things about their setups, yet I have no idea about their reliability record, but I assume it's good as well?
If SLP comes right out and claims 169.4 HP from their performance edition package (I often wonder why they didn't tweak something to make it 170 hp when they were that close) and I have heard that RKT sleds are approaching the 180 hp mark.
http://www.startinglineproducts.com/catalog.cfm?pageID=detail&catalogID=2&catID=52&productID=1070
Other than faster reving, how do you think the new 800 motors with claimed horse power ratings anywhere from 150 to 160 hp are going to compare in the field with sleds using a Speed Werx, SLP or RKT setups?
In speaking to SLP technicians, they have mentioned when asked, that the 2010 Arctic Cat M8 engine looks an awful lot like their perfomance edition modifiication on the inside (except for the crank changes). Several of the SLP techs told me that the reliability of their performance edition package was unbelievable, even to them! In fact, they said SLP did not know of ANY of these packages that have ever failed. That sounds like B.S. but, they haven't lied to me (that I know of) yet. They have also told me repeatedly that yes, there is more performance to be harvested from the Arctic Cat 800 engine than we squeeze out of our performance edition package, but they have found that it comes with a reliability cost. So, they feel their performance edition package is right in the sweet spot between power gain and reliability.
I have heard that sleds with RKT setups make even more horsepower than the SLP kit and I have heard many good things about their setups, yet I have no idea about their reliability record, but I assume it's good as well?
If SLP comes right out and claims 169.4 HP from their performance edition package (I often wonder why they didn't tweak something to make it 170 hp when they were that close) and I have heard that RKT sleds are approaching the 180 hp mark.
http://www.startinglineproducts.com/catalog.cfm?pageID=detail&catalogID=2&catID=52&productID=1070
Other than faster reving, how do you think the new 800 motors with claimed horse power ratings anywhere from 150 to 160 hp are going to compare in the field with sleds using a Speed Werx, SLP or RKT setups?
Last edited: