Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

I officially now wear a tin foil hat

I heard a blurb about this earlier, but blew it off as a conspiracy theory or "there must be a good reason" but when it came up again I looked at the article and again blew it off until I got past the first paragraphs and saw that the "source" was an FBI agent who knows something is very wrong with this (much like an ICE agent I know of who is continuing to uphold illegal imm. laws even if it costs his badge). I even called my state Reps office and the staffer said "I have no doubt." I'll let you guys/gal (Chick) weigh in.

I'll bold the alarming parts and the link is below for the whole context. John Bolton seems like a straight up guy that I can respect and if he is connected with this guy, it gives the latter more credibility to me. (see home page of link)
=====
"If you are one of the estimated 750,000 Americans who attended one of about 600 TEA parties last week, you might have seen media cameras covering the event. Media cameras, however, were not the only cameras taking video at these events, something that has at least one current FBI agent concerned over the future of America. According to this agent - the same agent who provided the Northeast Intelligence Network (NEIN) exclusively the unreleased photographs of the 11 missing Egyptian students who were the subject of a FBI BOLO in August 2006–placed his concerns for true patriots of the U.S. over his own career when he confided that covert surveillance was “planned and performed” at each of the TEA parties that took place last Tuesday.

“Listen to what I am saying,” stated the source during an interview with Doug Hagmann, founder (NEIN). “But it goes far beyond that assessment. There have been very significant changes made over the last few years that redirect the focus and assets of the intelligence community internally. These changes have greatly accelerated under this administration, and the threats have been redefined to include those who used to be patriots. It’s not only chilling but absolutely insulting to God-fearing Americans.”

According to this unimpeachable source, a single-page confidential directive issued by the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC (FBIHQ) was sent to each of the 56 field offices located across the United States on or about March 23, 2009, instructing the Special Agents in Charge (SACs) of those offices to verify the date, time and location of each TEA Party within their region and supply that information to FBI headquarters in Washington. The source stated this correspondence termed the TEA parties “political demonstrations,” and added that the dissemination of the directive was very tightly controlled. “Not all agents were privy to this correspondence,” stated the source, who compared the dissemination to an older “Do Not File” classification.

In addition to obtaining or confirming the location and time of each “demonstration,” each field office was instructed to obtain or confirm the identity of the individual(s) involved in the actual planning and coordination of the event in each specific region, and include the local or regional Internet web site address, if any. The information collected by region was then reportedly sent to FBI Headquarters.

The source alleges that a second directive was issued on or about April 6, 2009 that reportedly instructed each SAC to coordinate and conduct, either at the field office level and/or with the appropriate resident agency, covert video surveillance and data collection of the participants of the TEA parties. Surveillance was to be performed from “discreet fixed or mobile positions” and was to be performed “independently and outside of the purview of local law enforcement.”

Although the level of detail collected from each operation is unclear, the information was reportedly submitted to Washington, where, “at the level of the National Security Branch (NSB), this information was to “include the office of the Directorate of Intelligence (DI), and integrated with a restricted access database, one that reportedly is accessible to only two agencies” [of the 14 agencies that comprise the U.S. intelligence community, according to the source.

“The implications to the citizens of the U.S. are ominous. It seems that there is a hostile political agenda coming from Washington that characterizes the supporters of our constitutional freedoms as threats to our domestic security, which is totally absurd. The redirection, the refocusing of domestic threats from al Qaeda cells to ‘flag waving right-wingers’ is something that has gone from a murmur a few years ago to a roar today.”

Training government-issued cameras on ordinary citizens, many of whom brought their children to an estimated 600 Tax Day TEA Parties is a page torn out of George Orwell’s 1984 and makes the term “God Bless America” more meaningful than ever.

http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2659

Well, crap, I ended up bolding most of the article. :eek: At the tea party I went to there were all ages from children, teens, college students, all the way up to elderly. There was no rock throwing, screaming, cussing, challenging police, littering, faking bloody gashes, etc. Imagine doing this to peaceful, pro-American patriots who love our country. Is the World totally upside down or what?
 
Last edited:
The director of DHS pretty much conveyed this exact feeling. Next time there's a tea party, you need to turn the tables on them. Start taking pictures of all the camera operators. That's how the ghetto handles it. The man doesn't like being photographed.

The FBI has a long history of tracking people, associated with various groups. In the 50's and 60's, they tracked communist. In the 2000's, the government is the communist, and their tracking the opposition.

What's interesting, is the intelligence organizations seem to have picked sides.
 
Fluff, a big thank you to you, Ollie. Mps H2s, Swampy and all the rest who are working to awaken the masses. I am very passionate about it but I am not much of a communicator. I still can't believe the sheep in this country voted this clown in. I still would like to know who set him up, who paid for a Harvard education, who taught him to speak with the teleprompters and who puts the words in his mouth because he can't even talk on his own. he really isn't as eloquant as George Bush with out the teleprompters. Who is pulling the strings, Soros, or we may really be surprised at who it is. It can't be Obama on his own, if you notice he won't make any kind of a decision on the spur of the moment, he gets his orders elsewhere. I really think this has to be resolved BEFORE THE ELECTION IN 2010 OR SOONER OR WE WILL BE TAKEN OVER.
 
Last edited:
Wolf, funny you'd mention "it can't be Obama on his own." I just started yesterday compiling this stuff in one place that I had spread all over, so I could organize it in one spot and reference it. This was just on what you mentioned.

Sheep is right. Especially young people who've been brainwashed in the schools and who will be brought up under the GIVE act where you are told specific (gvt approved) organizations that are OK to "volunteer" for. I can guarantee you they don't do good research. The numbers of people are growing who will depend on our tax dollars to pay for their room and board. That translates to "depend on Gvt" (tax payers) so "vote for the dude that gives me free stuff [from other people's hard work]." and "I'm gonna vote for that wonderful man who gave 250 thousand people paid jobs to "volunteer" because I owe him."

The crap Fox pulls up every day that the OA is doing is mind blowing and I have the TV on most of the day in the background while I'm typing medical reports, so I always wonder about what people think who don't watch anything but CBS, NBC or ABC spinmeister news for 30 minutes when they get home.

Audit of Obama Fundraising Unlikely (corruption proven)
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/...2008/11/11/150153.html?s=al&promo_code=7105-1

Obama: Most Secretive Democratic Candidate Ever
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_secrecy/2008/10/22/143157.html?s=al&promo_code=6DF8-1

Dozens of Obama's Anti-American Friends
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1445/pub_detail.asp
 
Last edited:
Bingo! As mentioned by Ollie and I on my Hitler thread....this was a marked paved road and Obama was their chosen one!

In addition to obtaining or confirming the location and time of each “demonstration,” each field office was instructed to obtain or confirm the identity of the individual(s) involved in the actual planning and coordination of the event in each specific region, and include the local or regional Internet web site address, if any. The information collected by region was then reportedly sent to FBI Headquarters.

Holy chit!!!!!! ...bunch of government robots! This is mostly the kind of chit they do...what a productive agency. I have issues with the FBI....when I have worked with them they have always been arrogant pricks that take all the credit for my work! Maybe I will get in trouble for this statement...I could careless! I have never met a good hard working cop that had much good to say about them. I know there are good FBI agents out there...I don't mean to generalize and stereotype, but that agency is a breed of its own...I tell you what!

...and Fluff I wear a tin-foil hat too! Complacent people can tell me that all they want! I DON'T care! The people that tell me that wear a chit hat, because their head is up their A$$!!!

blue fluff you are a true steward of righteousness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I really appreciate you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.
 
Last edited:
You are a great American!!!!!!

f_benn2.gif
 
The one thing we have going for us is that Obama may be biting off more than he can chew at this time.
I think if he had waited on the medical take over and the stuff not related to the financial crisis (which I still think was set up) he would have been better set up.
However, he has overplayed his hand I think. I hope.
He didn't count on the backlash that is happening.

After the Tea Parties he called all his major cabinet members in and demanded they find 100 million in cuts. Now that is a total drop in the bucket compared to his 3.6 trillion dollar spending bill, but it gives him wiggle room to show he is "tough" on spending and working on forcing those beurocraps to work inside a budget.

It's still not playing well and I think a lot of people have had their eyes either opened already or are having them opened.

The main stream news is discovering they are losing viewers because the people no longer believe in the main stream news. That is why you are starting to see negative stuff about Obama.

And heres the main reason I think the news will totally turn on Obama in the coming months.
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!!

During the election there was big money to be made pushing Obama.
The libs in the media used this to push even harder. They vilified anyone or any organization that tried to print or speak the truth. As a result, Obama got elected because no one knew the truth. Well, the pigeons have come home to roost and the mainstream news is taking it in the azz BAD. Viewship is way down compared to news orgs like Fox news. Fox has more viewship than MSNBC, CNN, ABC and NBC combined.

There have been a few poles done (take that for what it's worth) that show the average american no longer trusts the main stream news to print or speak the truth. That translates to fewer viewers, which translates to less money they can charge for commercials, which translates into lower wages for all. Libs hate losing money even more than conservatives.

Plus, the libs have the ability to push their agenda un-empeded by any conservative input. That means the media can slam, trash and do their best to destroy the libs. They will get a lot of viewers off this and they know it. If the libs lose the 2010 election so what. The damage will have been done.

So I am still sticking to my end of june for the media to turn on Obama and the libs and the above is why.
 
Ollie, I've been wondering for a very LONG time about how Fox stacks up to ABC, NBC and CBS and I haven't been able to find any stats. Fox will say "we're #1 in Cable news" so I always wonder how that compares to non-cable. I know CNN is sinking like a rock.

Do you know what the viewership numbers are for each of the four?

That's SO encouraging!!

And I agree with you. I think we'd be really screwed if McCain was in because people would feel a false sense of safety. I voted for McCain but ONLY because I did my research on BO and I knew what he was and how he voted in the past. McCain does seem to really love America and he's tough, but he was Bushesque in his "let's compromise to get along" and placation when that doesn't work with the Left.
 
aw rats.
I went back and tried to find the article that listed the viewer stats during primetime that showed Fox destroying everyone else.

I can't find it, sorry.

The funny thing is, CNN was really up there. For a couple months prior to the election and exspecially during the election coverage, CNN was top dog. They had a full 24% of the viewers watching.

After the 787 billion dollar porkulous passed CNN ratings dropped like a rock and Fox News jumped accordingly. During the Tea Parties Fox enjoyed a 3 - 1 advantage over it's closest competator.

I think people are just sick and tired of the liberal mentality. The we can spend it, yes we can approach to anything they do. The Republicans were bad enough, but Obama has set the bar to new and outragous levels.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top