Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Here come the new taxes

A VAT's Bottom Line

What would it cost? Emanuel argues in his book that a 10 percent VAT would pay for every American not entitled to Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in a health plan with no deductibles and minimal copayments. In his 2008 book, "100 Million Unnecessary Returns," Yale law professor Michael J. Graetz estimates that a VAT of 10 to 14 percent would raise enough money to exempt families earning less than $100,000 -- about 90 percent of households -- from the income tax and would lower rates for everyone else.

And in a paper published last month in the Virginia Tax Review, Burman suggests that a 25 percent VAT could do it all: Pay for health-care reform, balance the federal budget and exempt millions of families from the income tax while slashing the top rate to 25 percent. A gallon of milk would jump from $3.69 to $4.61, and a $5,000 bathroom renovation would suddenly cost $6,250, but the nation's debt would stabilize and everybody could see a doctor.







I would take that. but with out the "Pay for health-care reform"











.
 
add onto it this little tidbit and you'll see where we are REALLY headed... http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/71520770-4a2c-11de-8e7e-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1

Standard and Poor’s decision to downgrade its outlook for British sovereign debt from “stable” to “negative” should be a wake-up call for the US Congress and administration. Let us hope they wake up.

Under President Barack Obama’s budget plan, the federal debt is exploding. To be precise, it is rising – and will continue to rise – much faster than gross domestic product, a measure of America’s ability to service it. The federal debt was equivalent to 41 per cent of GDP at the end of 2008; the Congressional Budget Office projects it will increase to 82 per cent of GDP in 10 years. With no change in policy, it could hit 100 per cent of GDP in just another five years.

“A government debt burden of that [100 per cent] level, if sustained, would in Standard & Poor’s view be incompatible with a triple A rating,” as the risk rating agency stated last week.

I believe the risk posed by this debt is systemic and could do more damage to the economy than the recent financial crisis. To understand the size of the risk, take a look at the numbers that Standard and Poor’s considers. The deficit in 2019 is expected by the CBO to be $1,200bn (€859bn, £754bn). Income tax revenues are expected to be about $2,000bn that year, so a permanent 60 per cent across-the-board tax increase would be required to balance the budget. Clearly this will not and should not happen. So how else can debt service payments be brought down as a share of GDP?
 
However, the vat would be (unless I am wrong) on top of what we are already paying.
Effectilely bring the average tax rate of 47% to 72%.
Why bother working.
 
However, the vat would be (unless I am wrong) on top of what we are already paying.
Effectilely bring the average tax rate of 47% to 72%.
Why bother working.

That would put our taxes right in line with other socialist states:eek: Wonder how many would actually quit working and stand in line for the freebees:confused:
 
The idea has merit.

National sales tax, and abolish the IRS. That's a fair tax. Without the IRS, no more tax based welfare (getting back more than you pay). No more IRS hassling businesses. No more invasion of privacy by the IRS. No more complicated tax laws.

Your simply taxed on what you spend. If you could do that, make it 25% sales tax for all I care. Everyone pays, if they buy. Drug dealers and panhandlers would suddenly be paying taxes. People selling food stamps (virtually) would pay taxes. Anyone earning undeclared wages would pay taxes. It all sounds pretty good to me. I guess the only down side, would be people who enter the country illegally, could take untaxed money, and ship it home tax free. Lots of them don't pay taxes anyways though.

And besides, Obama hates it, so it must be a good idea.
 
IF they did a flat tax and did away with everything else, yea.
I would be all for it.
They could generate as much revenue with a 20% flat tax as they get now.
The problem with a flat tax and the reason libs HATE it is simple.
It's obvious when they raise taxes.
Now there are SO freekin many taxes that they can pretty much do what they want and no one notices because it isn't redily apparent.

If they change a flat tax, it's obvious, it can't be hidden in other bills.

Besides the tax they are talking about is addition to the existing taxes, not instead of.
 
This VAT tax is interesting discussion for sure, but as Obama himself said he is not interested. The first major new tax we are going to see is on employee health care benefits. This tax would be a home run for the administration, as it accomplishes two goals: raising revenue and punishing private insurance. And they can structure it so the employer pays the tax and joe shmoe never sees the bill. :mad::mad::mad:
 
Last edited:
This VAT tax is interesting discussion for sure, but as Obama himself said he is not interested. The first major new tax we are going to see is on employee health care benefits. This tax would be a home run for the administration, as it accomplishes two goals: raising revenue and punishing private insurance. And they can structure it so the employer pays the tax and joe shmoe never sees the bill. :mad::mad::mad:

He may never see the bill, but he will see the pink slip.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top