I was suprised to see this in the Fri. Yakima herald
Fire disctrict 8 is arguing they should be able to plow a 13 ft wide path for a quater of a mile from the crystal springs snopark to the firestation built there 2 years ago. They say if they can't plow that the response time will be 20-30 min. slower along I-90.
The forest service is saying that the 1994 closure order says they can plow into it if they have an emergency call. the forest service has the support of the state and two recreational groups. The forest service says having a 13 ft wide groomed path would be unsafe for snopark users.
the article says there are 3 stations in fire disctrict 8 the first two cover the vacation homes and the volunteer firefighters only live there part time. Three fulltime residents that are on the department live with in 300 ft of the new station, adn their homes are snowbound as well.
Both sides hint that this goes back to the issue of lack of year round access to private property in that area.
I would sure hope that people wouldn't use emergency services to get closer to having year round access to their homes.
This is the first I have heard of this, anyone know more than what the article said? thoughts, opinions.
Fire disctrict 8 is arguing they should be able to plow a 13 ft wide path for a quater of a mile from the crystal springs snopark to the firestation built there 2 years ago. They say if they can't plow that the response time will be 20-30 min. slower along I-90.
The forest service is saying that the 1994 closure order says they can plow into it if they have an emergency call. the forest service has the support of the state and two recreational groups. The forest service says having a 13 ft wide groomed path would be unsafe for snopark users.
the article says there are 3 stations in fire disctrict 8 the first two cover the vacation homes and the volunteer firefighters only live there part time. Three fulltime residents that are on the department live with in 300 ft of the new station, adn their homes are snowbound as well.
Both sides hint that this goes back to the issue of lack of year round access to private property in that area.
I would sure hope that people wouldn't use emergency services to get closer to having year round access to their homes.
This is the first I have heard of this, anyone know more than what the article said? thoughts, opinions.