You seemed to make the point that it didn't matter as there weren't that many of them. So I was curious at what point does it become a problem.
I have no idea how many of them their are but I bet there not at the bottom or middle of the payscale so I don't think there is a problem there.
Good points. You are right, the top is pretty short, so therefore that has an effect on the average. Also correct on the military and the salaries. They do shift the scale lower. I wonder if they were included in the study? hmmm...
No idea either, I guess need to read the whole study and criteria.
Though the 26% less than COMPARABLE jobs is the key here. What do you have to say about that?
would have to read the study you picked that stat from, got a link?
A comparison say with a carpenter might look pretty skewed for instance as a union carpenter could make about 60,000.00 per year before overtime and a federal maintenance employee might make around the same but gets no where near as much overtime which boosts the pay tremendously. However the federal employee has greater stability, they don't get laid off when the work slows down and they receive pretty good benefits while the union carpenter receives no benefits their medical for intamce is provided through the union and deducted from their wages. Probably not part of that study.
Does the federal government pay state industrial and state employment taxes on their employees? It is impossible to compare unless it includes all factors within the study.
Do you want me to post job openings for the jobs areas listed above? The difference between a military job and a civilian contractor is fricken huge man. Like 200 - 300 % pay difference.
I don't think there is any comparison between the military and private contractors since we continue to underpay our military personal, won't argue with you on that one
Other areas the difference is not so much..