Has anybody used Dynotech research's pc5 map at high elevation on a 2010 800?Thinking about running it instead of slp's.Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anybody used Dynotech research's pc5 map at high elevation on a 2010 800?Thinking about running it instead of slp's.Any info would be greatly appreciated.
In my experience it was way too rich. SLP's map was spot on. There was a Dynotech map put out by "CHAD O" which was a tweak from the other DTJ maps and brought it back into line with SLP's but I haven't tested it yet. Looking at the map tables it is very similar to SLP's. I hope to try it early this season and report. I ride 4000-9000 ft.
Send me a PM with your e-mail and I can send you the Chad O map if you don't have it.
Kraven's point is worth considering. The original DTJ maps and the Chad O map were all based on the older OEM flashes up to and including the Jan.10 update. For my experiences and testing they were all done on an 09 Dragon with the piston/head update and the flash that came with that recall. The two original DTJ maps were extremely rich in the low/mid. for me. Top end seemed about the same as with SLP (map tables would confirm that)
I am surprised with Clarke 67's reply as the DTJ maps were between 15-35% richer in the low to mid range so it should have been very noticeable.
Cheers,
GKR
Thanks
and X2 on the bold, good or bad, there should have been a noticeable difference