Did anyone this season buy a new 2011 600 RMK?
What do you think of it?
What do you think of it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes I do,
It is a 144, stock except for a taller riser bar and clutch/exhaust venting kit.
Great solid sled with one exception:
When on the trail, (according to the dealer) it detonates around 7000rpm @ 2000'. Works great in the powder and playing, but on the trail to and from the playground it can act funny at lower elevations. Yes I know it is a RMK and it is designed for the fluff and boondocking, but sometimes one uses the trails to get to the play areas.
My description to the dealer of the problem that I have to live with that can not be fixed is that when you are backing off the throttle whether going straight or turning on the trail, there is a little hickup and you momentarily loose 3-400 RPM around 7000 rpm, you slide into the handle bars and then you get most of your rpm's back, but it seems a little sluggish until you cycle through the throttle range to full off to full on..... frustrating![]()
Poleman.... Do you notice any different power character between the 2 injector 2009 and the 4 injector 2011??
I own a 09 RMK 600 Shift (CFI2) and my brother has the 2010 600RMK, there is a difference on power. The CFI2 version is better at low range through mid range but the 4 valve takes over on the top end. You can tell if has a little more horse on the top end. I think both are great engines. The biggest thing I notice is the oil usage. The 2version is a lot better on oil. I like that feature good sled for my son.Poleman.... Do you notice any different power character between the 2 injector 2009 and the 4 injector 2011??
If I hadn't checked the parts manual I wouldn't have known the 2011 went back to 4 injectors.