DEMOCIDE: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom

[christopher]

This 5 minute video highlights the relationship between socialism, tyranny, the right to keep and bear arms and American freedom from 1776 until today.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/vide...m_tyranny_guns_and_freedom.html#ixzz2MDtLWVMR




<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0sujnvIV4g4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

​

 

[LoudHandle]

To the top for us, we need to oppose this movement. It is the reality we are currently living with. Obama couldn't give two sh_tts about the people of this country or he would not have done what he has done time and time again. You Obama supporters think he is better than Romney? But he has given away more money's to the rich than Romney would have and also bought votes from the poor by giving moneys to welfare, illegal aliens, and other such groups. All he has done for the average joe is raise taxes. Meanwhile pulling the entire country into unfathomable debt.

We need to fight this planned disarmourment whatever the cost, if we do not, the cost will be far greater.

 

[xc6rider]

And, that's only ONE example of what happened after the disarmament, of only one country. Much more factual evidence of the others. disarmament leads to tyranny and possibly genocide. One can't re-write history, and one is foolish for ignoring it.

 

[POLZIN]

I wonder what gave them the idea the could just trample our rights and the constitution.

They are ALL the same !

 

[christopher]

I suppose everyone KNOWS how I feel about the 2nd amendment.

 

[christopher]

Added a 2nd video

 

[beard]

You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it! The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of America.

(Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0


The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)

"The People" does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)

 

[polaris dude]

To the top for us, we need to oppose this movement. It is the reality we are currently living with. Obama couldn't give two sh_tts about the people of this country or he would not have done what he has done time and time again. You Obama supporters think he is better than Romney? But he has given away more money's to the rich than Romney would have and also bought votes from the poor by giving moneys to welfare, illegal aliens, and other such groups. All he has done for the average joe is raise taxes. Meanwhile pulling the entire country into unfathomable debt.

We need to fight this planned disarmourment whatever the cost, if we do not, the cost will be far greater.

Yes, that must be why the rich people hate him, because he keeps giving them so much money!

 

[donbrown]

Yes, that must be why the rich people hate him, because he keeps giving them so much money!

Yep, Tiger Woods made how much last year? Private golf game weekend.

Immelt CEO of GE hangs with the Prez all the time ... GE had over 147 billion in sales and grossed over 75 billion .... PAID NO FEDERAL TAXES !!!!

Oh and here are "recorded" 2008 campaign contributors indirectly thru PACS to Elect Obama


University of California

$1,648,685

Goldman Sachs

$1,013,091

Harvard University

$878,164

Microsoft Corp

$852,167

Google Inc

$814,540

JPMorgan Chase & Co

$808,799

Citigroup Inc

$736,771

Time Warner

$624,618

Sidley Austin LLP

$600,298

Stanford University

$595,716

National Amusements Inc

$563,798

WilmerHale LLP

$550,668

Columbia University

$547,852

Skadden, Arps et al

$543,539

UBS AG

$532,674

IBM Corp

$532,372

General Electric

$529,855


Morgan Stanley

$512,232

 

[donbrown]

Yes, that must be why the rich people hate him, because he keeps giving them so much money!

Come to California they give military helicopter rides above Hollywood when you contribute to Obama ... and the rides are still goin on.

Obama's relection campaign spent (officially) $1,112,041,699 thats over 1.1 billion to get reelcted not included the collateral deals like Obama Phone !

 

[BHPete]

I think this might belong in this thread? A MUST read!

http://dcclothesline.wordpress.com/...bility-to-fight/comment-page-20/#comment-9043

 

[christopher]

That is a great article.
Been making the rounds in all the gun circles.

 

[donbrown]

Like it was said before by those in charge.

They won't have to take the guns cause you wont be able to buy bullets, or get parts.

Or anytime you show the weapon or use it it will be illegal.

Here near Los Angeles I know of no public gun ranges (criminals fire weapons here all the time) except for those for military and police. But I admit I never looked for one here.

Sure there are private gun ranges but it cost much money just to havethe building much less the fees to shoot.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the revolutionary war was "ignited" by one such reason ... taxation and control of all products entering a port like gunpowder, tea, food etc. British took control of ports using the military to "enforce" regulation.

Thjs gun battle is being fought (IMHO) to "help" reduce big city crime by "do something , do anything" attitude just as long as I (city slicker) don't have to be restricted by the new rules.

For people here to get a perspective on how this "right to bear arms" is important ... I ask the good citizens here in LA if the US Goverment has the right to restrict what vehicle you can buy. Of course they come back and boast they can buy any vehicle they want. Oh I reply ... can you park just "any" vehicle in your driveway, yard, or on the street. Can the government deny the right and create massive licensing fees to drive a vehicle? Not only can they they do thru emmissions, weight, size and appearance. Also restricting what kind of vehicle you can park in your driveway. Why cause driving is a priviledge and not a "natural right".

To further this we all have the "natural right" to protect life, liberty and the persuit of happiness. The debate is much like it was over 200 years ago. How much right does the government have to restrict an individuals right cause most people today don't know how to protect life, liberty and the persuit of happiness.