Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Cats 2010 800 H.O. info

now how will this new monster do on boost? with different port timing and higher compression im not sure that you could just "plug and play" a turbo. But what an awesome out of the box sled this will be.
 
now how will this new monster do on boost? with different port timing and higher compression im not sure that you could just "plug and play" a turbo. But what an awesome out of the box sled this will be.

I was told that the Cat engineers have tested this engine on boost themselves, and had great results!!!
 
Finally a stock sled that will need no mods to be competitive. A can and a mesh hood and I am in business.:cool:
 
Interesting though that the graph only starts the 2010 cat at 7500 rpm, and the others are starting from 7400. Could this mean that below 7500 in the low and mid grunt areas it falls on its face and only makes a screaming top end???

After seeing that graph, the less rotating mass/inertia kinda makes me think it might be a dog down low. Great for sheer hp numbers true but I still remember the days of old suzuki 2-strokes which only made hp up high made things difficult unless all your doing is pinning it everywhere. I still find for my type of tree riding a solid mid range is just as useful as peak numbers.

Would like to see the whole picture, that graph could be a bit deceiving.
 
Interesting though that the graph only starts the 2010 cat at 7500 rpm, and the others are starting from 7400. Could this mean that below 7500 in the low and mid grunt areas it falls on its face and only makes a screaming top end???

After seeing that graph, the less rotating mass/inertia kinda makes me think it might be a dog down low. Great for sheer hp numbers true but I still remember the days of old suzuki 2-strokes which only made hp up high made things difficult unless all your doing is pinning it everywhere. I still find for my type of tree riding a solid mid range is just as useful as peak numbers.

Would like to see the whole picture, that graph could be a bit deceiving.

i just got snowgoer, snowtech, and am snow. all of them say the cat 800 pulls really hard on the bottom and revs up fast.
 
Interesting though that the graph only starts the 2010 cat at 7500 rpm, and the others are starting from 7400. Could this mean that below 7500 in the low and mid grunt areas it falls on its face and only makes a screaming top end???

After seeing that graph, the less rotating mass/inertia kinda makes me think it might be a dog down low. Great for sheer hp numbers true but I still remember the days of old suzuki 2-strokes which only made hp up high made things difficult unless all your doing is pinning it everywhere. I still find for my type of tree riding a solid mid range is just as useful as peak numbers.

Would like to see the whole picture, that graph could be a bit deceiving.



dynotech #s show from 7500rpm (146hp) to peak only, this is the power valve opening point on the 10' 800. it was increased 500 rpm, from 7000 on the 09'.

I feel it will be a good engine, with the extra top end kick and throttle response many have wanted in the 07-09's. however, I agree it would be nice to see a dyno pull from the bottom end up as well. especially since the demo program has been pulled back!



.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top