Seems to get along just fine. I tried it back to back with a 530, same year and I really like the nimble feeling mine has over a 530. I will also say that mine seems to be able to go everywhere one of them go but need to generally spin more to do it. But just like on dirt, I find the 300 more fun even if it doesn't climb quite as well. It also uses more gas but never used up my spare carboy. The 300 also has a terrible e-starter compared to the fours. My buddy also compared mine to a 690 and the 690 just pulls through everything no problem. But the 690 seems more 'automotive' in construction making it less durable than the 530 or 300 (we broke a lot of stuff on it in 3 days whereas as we broke nothing on the other bikes). Surprisingly the 690 was also fairly nimble but hard to get unstuck when you buried it. I ran the 300 last year to see if I wanted to upgrade to a four stroke this year and I don't think I will. If I do, it will only be because I want a second bike dedicated for snow biking and then would go FI 450 estart MX bike. I'd just run studs on the 300 for fall/spring and tires for summer as I don't like that I have to go only to the big mountains instead of a local icy trail due to having only the one bike. But if I can only have one bike, I will keep the 300 as I wouldn't want to give it up for summer just for the sake of the slight improvement in snow biking climbing ability. In fact, I prefer the trees anyway and the 300 is more fun in the glades IMO. JC