My sled is a 2015 with about 18 Hrs the lower bolt broke the week before the recall was issued,
while my buddy was trail riding with his wife.
The problem is created by excessive clearance between the sprocket & the drive shaft spline this thing fits like a saddle on a sow.
Without putting these parts up on my CMM to map out the exact clearances I would estimate there's about 0.01-0.015 of slop and it is not realistic to expect any 10 m.m.bolt to constrain the movement of the pulley under the load conditions it subjected to in this application.
The higher quality bolt will help but long term I have serious concerns that the problem will not repeat.
Polaris's solution of recessing the on the 16s is helpful as it transfers the movement away from the bolt head.
I made a drill guide for removing the broken bolt we have now used it twice it takes all the pain out of this process.
I took my sled the dealer which is a two plus hour drive as I would not take a push lawnmower to the local dealer.
They contacted Polaris who to their credit promptly sent replacement parts .
The problem is that the replacement drive-shaft pulley combo had as much or more slop than the original ones .
If the solution to this issue was as simple as just replacing the lower bolt with a slightly more expensive one why did Polaris not do this on the 16 sleds.
I expressed my concern to my dealer that the replacement parts will fail again under potentially life threatening conditions.
The response from Polaris was just to put the new parts in disregard the extreme amount of slop and follow the recall bulletin for installing the 12.9 bolt .
At this time I will move forward updating the drive-shaft end to the 16 configuration that utilizes a 45 m.m.12.9 grade bolt and then replace this bolt on regular schedule.
As I have little faith in what others have expressed and I consider to be a severely compromised design due to the extreme amount of clearance between the pulley and spline which is made worse by the cantilevered load on this pulley.