Post Yellowstone trip update...
First, I'll start off by saying that I LOVE this sled.
Our week in Yellowstone was pretty snowy... Only one day with good visibility, but lots of days with great snow!
I was able to hop back and forth a fair bit between my '09 Sno Pro and the '09 BD HCR.
Understand that the HCR actually has '07 M series front arms and spindles, Powder Pro skiis, and an unidentified Camso mountain track, so aside from the front shocks and the stickers, it's really not an HCR anymore. I haven't measured them, but I suspect that the HCR front shocks have not been shortened, which is why it works out OK with the rear skid fully dropped. It definitely sits higher than my Sno Pro... I'll probably leave it that way, since it also keeps it up out of the snow better, and I think it sidehills easier than my lower SnoPro.
The track on it just says Camso and a part number. I haven't looked it up. The paddles are ~2" tall and are deformed so they seem to lift the snowmobile as the track spins faster rather than digging in... It stops well, but it likes to spin the track rather than digging in at takeoff.
I'm now a big fan of the turbo! It ran flawless the entire trip. I am running the boondocker suggested numbers, set for 5PSI at 7000', with Electronic Boost Control that gains ~1psi/1000'. With these numbers, the Koso EGT gauges didn't show anything scary on the one ride I made while they worked. They crapped out for the whole yellowstone trip, but the sled ran great, so I'm inclined to say it's at lest close enough for me.
The tall 2010/11 style seat is simply awesome. I want one for my Sno Pro...
Climbing in deep powder, I saw track speeds around 50mph! Once the track cleared 30, the sled seemed to lift up out of the snow, which I attribute to the deformed paddles compressing some snow under the spinning track. Though it would easily outclimb my Sno Pro, it sure seems like it could use more track.
The sleds I was riding with were non-turbo's. The new 850 Summit in our group with a ~155 x 3" track was king of the hill for sure, just poking around where the rest of us had to get at it some. In a straight powder climb, the 3" track and power of that 850 did much better than my turbo, which was the next closest performer. The other two sleds (an 800 Summit and a Pro-chassis Assault) were both 2.5" tracks of similar length, and both struggled a bit more than my 2" turbo. The turbo definiately saved the day for me!!
I really like this sled. I honestly bought it with no intention of keeping it, but now I'm considering selling the Sno Pro... I think this is workable if I find a 2.6" PC for the turbo. If I find a 3" PC (or Camso Extreme) for the turbo, I'll probably look for a mountain seat for the Sno Pro and keep it, using the turbo for deep powder days... I do get attached to my "things"...
On the last day, the light was terrible and after the snow moved in, I kept getting stuck in drifts that I couldn't see, or in this case, by submarining in a soft spot created by buried small trees. (There were 4 more under the sled after we tugged it out.)
Oh, I also put a rear flap on it from Proven Design Products. Best snow flap ever!!! (Not a paid endorsement, but I'll put using Matt's flaps on every sled that needs one from now on!!)
provendesignproducts.com
This is my wife sitting on it... She ended up riding it some too, since the '14 Pro-RMK 600 that we picked up on the way to West Yellowstone turned out to be a total tank, and very hard for even us heavier guys to ride. (It's already for sale if anyone wants it...)
So that's where this ended up. Anyone with track suggestions for me is welcome to chime in. I think a 3" track would be awesome, but a 2.6" PC would also probably get it done just fine, and might fit easier.
Thanks for reading, and be sure to get out and ride whatever you have!!!