Just wondering how it rides and if it is worth the money it costs to do it. also what track are working good with what gearing and driver size on a factory 2.6 track belt drive machine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was thinking of this after I seen the Burandt vid. Not sure I'd want the longer track but it got me wondering what needs to be done to put the 3" 162 powerclaw in the 163 skid? Just drivers needed or is there more too it?
Drivers and anti stab kit
Was thinking of this after I seen the Burandt vid. Not sure I'd want the longer track but it got me wondering what needs to be done to put the 3" 162 powerclaw in the 163 skid? Just drivers needed or is there more too it?
I agree a 155 tunnel with 174 rails would looks sweet. I wonder how much better handling it would be. I wonder if ice age makes any rails that would help. Thanks for all the good info and help in this post
In the parts break down the rails are the same part number. So any changes would be shock calibration not physical mounting locations. I do know there are changes to the arm mount points between the 174 and the 163/155 ones. I believe the drop brackets are further back on the tunnel for the rear mount point.Does anyone know if the rear skid on the 19 with react rear suspension is any different than the 18 skid
Does anyone no a good way for me to trade or sell my 2018 brand new 155 2.6 track for brand new 163 2.6 track or is there a better track to try to use like power claw
Yup. Did it last year with a 155 to 163. Tunnel length is fine and the 163 rails are a direct swap on the skid. I think it looks better with the longer track and shorter tunnel myself.
Left the belt drive alone, nothing changes there between 55 2.6 to 63 2.6
I ran a camo extreme 2.5 and it was a snow condition dependent performer. I’d get the Polaris 2.6 myself if I was doing it over again.
Ride improves over moguls