I changed my currently just for you.
Thank you. I'm clearly a life long die hard polaris guy. I'm guessing my screen name must give it away
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I changed my currently just for you.
The thing is if you would have actually shut your dick holster and took your own advice and actually read through the thread you would have realized that most of the people your arguing with actually agreed with you on how her opinion is not valid do to her sponsorship. Difference is everyone else spoke there piece and moved on like growed ups and didn't sit here and try to start $hit with anyone that had a differing opinion than there's. This might come as a shock but they're might actually be some folks that really do prefer the ride of the fat heavy yamicat over the pro, I mean hell, I can't stand the feel of a doo with the **** eyed steering and can't understand how someone can want to ride one but yet 1000s of folks do and seem pretty happy.
You can try to play catch-up all you want with the Yamaha, but you can't honestly believe that older, heavier technology is working better than the Pros. Sure they have great engine longevity, which I pointed out in my first post CHRISTOPHER. I bet you'd be crying for a bone stock 2 stroke to ride instead of your heavy, underpowered, whored-out 2nd hand chassis snowmobile.
Really
Do you REALLY want to start looking at PRODUCT FAILURES comparing POO to YAMAHA. My "Older Heavier Technology" Absolutely works better. Mile after Mile, Year after Year, Horsepower after Horsepower. Yamaha ENDURE and LAST.
When was the last time you heard of a Yamaha engine BURNING DOWN or A-ARMS coming apart. Get serious. Yes, the Yamaha's are built like a FRIGGIN TANK, they last forever, take all the abuse you can possible dish out to them and WEIGH MORE because of it.
Yamahas are a PLATFORM that owners build on.
For reasons that none of us seem to be able to figure out Yamaha Corporate simply doesn't want to "Go For It" in the mountain segment.
They don't want to be on the Bleeding Failing edge of technology like Polaris is. Because of that, guys like you trash talk them all day long.
But last night I turned the key for the first time on my 275hp Turbo kit.
And you know what, I am sure that engine will be running strong for THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of TROUBLE FREE miles.
Go ahead and try that on your 800cc Poo and lets see how long it holds together before it GRENADES on you shall we?
Really
Do you REALLY want to start looking at PRODUCT FAILURES comparing POO to YAMAHA. My "Older Heavier Technology" Absolutely works better. Mile after Mile, Year after Year, Horsepower after Horsepower. Yamaha ENDURE and LAST.
When was the last time you heard of a Yamaha engine BURNING DOWN or A-ARMS coming apart. Get serious. Yes, the Yamaha's are built like a FRIGGIN TANK, they last forever, take all the abuse you can possible dish out to them and WEIGH MORE because of it.
Yamahas are a PLATFORM that owners build on.
For reasons that none of us seem to be able to figure out Yamaha Corporate simply doesn't want to "Go For It" in the mountain segment.
They don't want to be on the Bleeding Failing edge of technology like Polaris is. Because of that, guys like you trash talk them all day long.
But last night I turned the key for the first time on my 275hp Turbo kit.
And you know what, I am sure that engine will be running strong for THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of TROUBLE FREE miles.
Go ahead and try that on your 800cc Poo and lets see how long it holds together before it GRENADES on you shall we?
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/U4fcOh81yu4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
EDIT:I stand corrected ^1 person does not agree that the yamaha has better engine life
poos break a arms. Nytros break sub frames. Poo riders have to replace Pistons every other year. Yamaha riders have to replace their oil every time they tip their sled. Life is full of trade offs.
Sorry, just not true.
I have FIVE of them.
We ride EVERY WEEKEND.
have MANY MANY MANY THOUSANDS of miles on them.
No issues with sub frames.
Every sled has a rollover kit on it.
No issues with oil.
Christopher,
Do you have any FACTS that support your claim that Yamaha is a more reliable sled than a Polaris?
If not,
Do you think if Yamaha had the number of sleds on the snow that Polaris has that your claim would hold true seeing how bad news travels faster than good especially on SW?
Really
Do you REALLY want to start looking at PRODUCT FAILURES comparing POO to YAMAHA. My "Older Heavier Technology" Absolutely works better. Mile after Mile, Year after Year, Horsepower after Horsepower. Yamaha ENDURE and LAST.
When was the last time you heard of a Yamaha engine BURNING DOWN or A-ARMS coming apart. Get serious. Yes, the Yamaha's are built like a FRIGGIN TANK, they last forever, take all the abuse you can possible dish out to them and WEIGH MORE because of it.
Yamahas are a PLATFORM that owners build on.
For reasons that none of us seem to be able to figure out Yamaha Corporate simply doesn't want to "Go For It" in the mountain segment.
They don't want to be on the Bleeding Failing edge of technology like Polaris is. Because of that, guys like you trash talk them all day long.
But last night I turned the key for the first time on my 275hp Turbo kit.
And you know what, I am sure that engine will be running strong for THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of TROUBLE FREE miles.
Go ahead and try that on your 800cc Poo and lets see how long it holds together before it GRENADES on you shall we?
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/U4fcOh81yu4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I think you already know this and are ignoring it, but the point of this entire discussion has nothing to do with reliability. I don't think a single soul here will disagree with the fact that 4 strokes will hold together the longest.
I would be curious if other people such as myself(who own neither a pro or a yamaha or a turbo sled in general) given the same circumstances as stated in the OP and what their preferences would be.
EDIT:I stand corrected ^1 person does not agree that the Yamaha has better engine life
man o man i've heard it all now , when it was a cat the chassis was deeply flawed and had known problems, now that they wrote yamaha on the out side it's the epitome of durability handling and quality.
ABSOLUTELY!Can't deny the new vipers had oil leaking issues, which are now resolved.
Well said Christopher.
I can understand brand loyality, but I don't understand people who feel the need to berate others because they like something different.
ndC7M8 said in one post that it was bullshirt that yamahajohnson220 was doing mods on a Viper and that it supported the nonsense that he has been spewing. Then a few posts later, he was instructing Remmy on what mods he should have done on his Pro in order to make it work. Kind of contradictory don't you think?
The fact is that just about anyone who is serious about mountain sledding does mods on their sleds. If not for better performance (boost, longer tracks, bigger paddles, different skis, clutching, gearing, a-arms, shocks, skids...), then in order to make it fit them better (risers, boards, seats, handlebars...).
It's actually hilarious and ndC7M8 comes off looking like the village idiot. It's like the reincarnation of Ouraysledder. In fact, I haven't seen Ouraysledder in awhile. Could it be him?
Just so you know ndC7M8, the majority of the people reading your posts see you as a tool. Even your fellow Polaris Pro riders. You would have been far better to say that you disagree with Coyotegirl and maybe brought up a few factual points than continue with your nonsense.
If you don't like Vipers, don't ride one. Otherwise, shut hole. I doubt you've spent any time on one and we may be interested in your opinion once you've put a few hundred miles on on one. "I rode one and didn't like it" really doesn't cut it. Get some real seat time in the steep and deep and report back to us.
I haven't ridden a Viper, but everything I've read by those who have has been overwhelmingly positive. Even guys coming off of Pro's seem to have good things to say. So that leads me to believe that it probably handles pretty well in the mountains.
Who knows, Coyotegirl may even be right about her observation.
Well said Christopher.
I can understand brand loyality, but I don't understand people who feel the need to berate others because they like something different.
ndC7M8 said in one post that it was bullshirt that yamahajohnson220 was doing mods on a Viper and that it supported the nonsense that he has been spewing. Then a few posts later, he was instructing Remmy on what mods he should have done on his Pro in order to make it work. Kind of contradictory don't you think?
The fact is that just about anyone who is serious about mountain sledding does mods on their sleds. If not for better performance (boost, longer tracks, bigger paddles, different skis, clutching, gearing, a-arms, shocks, skids...), then in order to make it fit them better (risers, boards, seats, handlebars...).
It's actually hilarious and ndC7M8 comes off looking like the village idiot. It's like the reincarnation of Ouraysledder. In fact, I haven't seen Ouraysledder in awhile. Could it be him?
Just so you know ndC7M8, the majority of the people reading your posts see you as a tool. Even your fellow Polaris Pro riders. You would have been far better to say that you disagree with Coyotegirl and maybe brought up a few factual points than continue with your nonsense.
If you don't like Vipers, don't ride one. Otherwise, shut hole. I doubt you've spent any time on one and we may be interested in your opinion once you've put a few hundred miles on on one. "I rode one and didn't like it" really doesn't cut it. Get some real seat time in the steep and deep and report back to us.
I haven't ridden a Viper, but everything I've read by those who have has been overwhelmingly positive. Even guys coming off of Pro's seem to have good things to say. So that leads me to believe that it probably handles pretty well in the mountains.
Who knows, Coyotegirl may even be right about her observation.