Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

87 octane is bad!!

Cerialsledder

SnoWest Badge Maker
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Just bought the sled a week ago and have been fighting the damn DET on the sled so I finally said to hell with it and drained the tank and put 93 in it... All my problems went away.. Isn't it wonderful on how much we pay for such a wonderful fuel.... ugh!!!
 
If you thought running your sled on 100% 87 was a good idea, then you may want to read some maintenance threads before going out for a ride..
 
funny thing too...

i knw a few people that put 87 octane in sleds...and even my brother putting 85 street bike saying 91 is too $$, blah blah...

put it this way...on a sled...what 10 gallons MAX...$.10/.20 cents difference in 85-91 octane...thats a whole $1-$2 more and you eliminate those DET issues and possible burn down..

and my brother has a 4 gallon tank on his bike....i was like DUDE...$.40-.80 CENTS more to fill it...he was like...oh yeh didn think of it that way....WTF...lol
 
What elevation are you guys riding at? I've been running 87-88 at 10-12k feet with no problems. At those elevations the motor doesn't burn all the octane and you are basically eating your money. All the shops I've talked to about this confirm it.
 
I know and I'm sorry :( it was *lmost 3 a.m. when I wheeled in with my truck and trailer and decided to fill it up... I don't even run 87 in my 03 700 sks.... please I encourage you to yell at me more and I'm not being sarcastic..... i damn near tore down the engine to do a rebuild lol
 
I don't know, I just put 900 Iron Dog miles on my 2013 Polaro TX 800 SnoTraveler with 740 miles on sub-recommended octane fuel, with lots of fill ups pumped from barrels - hopefully not from the bottom. I ran the engine on the 91 octane setting for the slower portion of the run, switching to the lower octane setting for the river runs, where oil was added to the fuel. Air temperatures averaged -20 degrees with stiff at times headwinds on the rivers. Iso was also regularly added. The "det" ceiling was hit once on both legs. In each time, the engine was shut down and restarted and the riding style that caused the issue was avoided. My teammate on a similar sled experienced similar issues.

For those that haven't experienced it, the 800 engine is the absolute bomb for trail based sled. Run along at 5600 to 6250 rpm throttle it up to 6850 rpm and increase speed by 50%. We had our "det" issues when we pegged the throttle rapidly in hard pulling snow. Slower throttle pulls, say to 7800 rpm, resulted in most pleasurable moments, anytime you want. The lower rpm pull this engine has is simply breathtaking. Cruising at these engine speeds provided enough speed for this trip and resulted also in fantastic fuel mileage. We made the 120 mile run up the Yukon from Ruby to Tanana using 7.5 gallons each. Like said mostly on minimum grade octane fuel. Note: The TX 800 SnoTraveler is a rebadged by me Switchback Assault - a name I don't quite get. 550iq
 
Premium Features



Back
Top