3” vs. 2.75” 155
- Thread starter braapin
- Start date
Have had both, the 3" is more robust but heavier and digs more, I sure prefer the series 8 for trees and climbs. Meadows, well 3" is more fun.
I have the same question on track. Seems like 3" changed with QD2. Vohk talked about how they liked the 3" boost more this year. And the preview video from snowest on the new polaris all said they liked the 3" better also on the day the test rode them and that was at 8500 in fluffy powder.
The series 8 folds over way too easy.
Doesn’t last……
4-5 split lugs plus missing chunks on 3 others @ 150 miles………
Doesn’t last……
4-5 split lugs plus missing chunks on 3 others @ 150 miles………
wifes n/a 165 has the 2.7", my boost 163 has the 3". I think there both on the right sled.
I didnt like the 3" much on the 800, but its a different animal on the boost. vibrates less too
I didnt like the 3" much on the 800, but its a different animal on the boost. vibrates less too
Where do you live in relation to where Vohk rides?
His snow might be a bit different than where you ride.
Conditions play a huge role.
Don't know till you try for your self.
I live and ride mostly in Utah. I have a boost with a 2.75 and I have been happy, but I haven't had a 3" on the boost. I had a 3" on the 800 and preferred the 2.6 on that one.
