H
highmark289
Well-known member
I think the t-motion skid will do fine with a turbo, sense its a new skid it will just take some time finding new settings for the skid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you had me until you said the 2013 154 would out climb the 2012 163.
I read the review from highmark289 a couple of days ago and liked how things sounded...but when I read that it climbed better than a 12' I too was a skeptic. Hmm same engine, track and weight how could the XM climb any different?
I was able to ride the 13 yesterday and without a doubt it climbs better! I own a 12' 154 and switched back an forth to confirm the way the new machine performs. The new skid geometry improves deep snow performance without question. I was blown away by the complete package.
Just looking at the skid geometry it should do much better on the hills and in the deep...shallower approach and rear scissor position should keep the nose down better.
How was the bump ride compared to the 12?
Did it seem darty on the road? If there was a road-
I read the review from highmark289 a couple of days ago and liked how things sounded...but when I read that it climbed better than a 12' I too was a skeptic. Hmm same engine, track and weight how could the XM climb any different?
I was able to ride the 13 yesterday and without a doubt it climbs better! I own a 12' 154 and switched back an forth to confirm the way the new machine performs. The new skid geometry improves deep snow performance without question. I was blown away by the complete package.
I believe that in the review that beans was talking about (highmark289's), highmark was saying that the new 2013 154 outclimbed an 2012 163.your comparing a 154 to a 154... that's plausible.
you had me until you said the 2013 154 would out climb the 2012 163.
I got my 2013 summit x on thursday and have 300 miles on it now....mostly deep days! Summit Seeker is right the sled is more amazing everytime I ride it...the attack angle the way it floats...seriously dont ride one unless your purchasing one..I wont ride my freeride for the rest of the season...I am the luckiest boy on the planet...today was especially good!
Why do you think it outclimbed the 2012. not lighter, similar track and rear suspension. I'm just a little surprised that was your finding. Awesome, that it did, just don't see why. any ideas?
Could this be in part due to you're now working at a Polaris dealer. The new XM a POS, really?? Just wondering if you were working at Doo dealer if your evaluation would differ?especially on this POS. I have own Ski Doos since 99 but I will no longer be on one.
I got to demo the 2013 yesterday as well and all I can say is "wow'! I currently ride a 2012 163 X and the 2013 is a dream to ride in comparison.
To respond that the 154 would out climb the 163....I would say it definitely can. I would have to say it is the new approach angle that would make the difference.
What I really found amazing about this sled was the ability to turn on a dime. I rode trees the entire time except for the trail ride in and all you do is lean and it goes where you want it to go. (at least in the deep) As others have said, it does not handle great on the trail but not many of us ride trail!
I usually get a new sled every two years but I might have to bite the bullet and spring order a T-ETEC 2013 for next year!! My dealer is offering a 2013 163 X package with an aerocharger turbo set up at 8 pounds of boost (240 HP) with a 3" track and different drivers. I just hope the wife lets me write the check!!
What this sled is going to do is turn average riders into great riders!