Good evening,
I've been reading about how much more effective the cooling system is on the standard RMK model over the Pro yet after examining the plumbing of the coolers on the standard model, I'm at a loss as to why?
It would appear that the front heat exchanger on the standard RMK would see maximum flow until the thermostat starts to open at which point the flow would begin to pass through the rear coolers. Given the logic that a fluid takes the path of least resistance it's surprising that the RMK doesn't actually run hotter as the coolant would favor the front cooler circuit over the rear when the thermostat is wide open? You'd think the cooling system would be more effective if all three coolers were plumbed in series?
One can't argue with the fact that the standard RMK runs cooler than the Pro, I just wish someone would explain how it's possible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfa20/cfa20e77dc7e0448df164aa679e0cce545815f9a" alt="RMK Cooling System.jpg RMK Cooling System.jpg"
I've been reading about how much more effective the cooling system is on the standard RMK model over the Pro yet after examining the plumbing of the coolers on the standard model, I'm at a loss as to why?
It would appear that the front heat exchanger on the standard RMK would see maximum flow until the thermostat starts to open at which point the flow would begin to pass through the rear coolers. Given the logic that a fluid takes the path of least resistance it's surprising that the RMK doesn't actually run hotter as the coolant would favor the front cooler circuit over the rear when the thermostat is wide open? You'd think the cooling system would be more effective if all three coolers were plumbed in series?
One can't argue with the fact that the standard RMK runs cooler than the Pro, I just wish someone would explain how it's possible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfa20/cfa20e77dc7e0448df164aa679e0cce545815f9a" alt="RMK Cooling System.jpg RMK Cooling System.jpg"