Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Ramps in the TRA, how they work and how they effect performance.

T

tollen77

Member
There's been a lot of talk recently regarding BRP's switch in the '09 Summits from the 42 helix to the 43/47 in the secondary yet very little about the switch to a 413 ramp to the 441 in the primary. I'm hoping this thread will get the discussion started.

I still have a lot to learn regarding clutching, though I've learned a lot in the last couple years. The one thing that I haven't found much info on is ramp angles.

As a refresher for those that don't know, the TRA primary has three arms that swing outwards as RPM increases and swing back inwards as RPM decreases. They swing on a path guided by three ramps. These ramps are attached to the moveable sheeve of the primary clutch. As the arms swing outward they slide along the ramps and in doing so close the primary. The more the primary closes, the greater the effective 'gear ratio' of the drive 'sprocket'.

As the belt is pinched by the primary clutch it forces itself further down in the secondary clutch. This also further increase the effective 'gear ratio' of the system. (Think of shifting up or down in gears on your 10 speed.) As the secondary turns it does not directly drive the track through the chaincase and axle. The helix distributes the amount of load provided by the secondary to the jackshaft faster or slower depending on its angle. The steeper the angle (44,45,46,47,etc...) the faster the helix transfers load the between the jackshaft and the secondary. The shallower the angle (42,41,40, etc...) the slower the load is transfered.


Back to ramps;

It is the curvature of the ramp that adjusts the timing and the degree to which the movable sheeve of the primary slides in and out at a given RPM.


Here's where I'm a little uncertain (If you have something to add or change to this description, please do):

I believe that the more aggressive the curvature of the ramp is, the faster the clutch will close and therefore, the faster the primary will shift. This, of course, depends on the load that will be placed on the primary (and therefore the engine) by the track through the secondary clutch.

- If the curvature of the ramp is too aggressive relative to the power of the engine, the engine will bog and your sled will accelerate slower.

- If the curvature of the ramp is not aggressive enough relative to the power of the engine, the sled will not accelerate as quickly as it could as the engine isn't working as hard as it possibly could.

This leads to what I beleive to be a clutching law : The more powerful your engine, the more aggressive the ramps in your clutch can be.

Correct????



One more question: There is clearly a difference in a 413 ramp compared to a 441 to a ______. With a helix the number that describes the helix refers to the angle (or angles) of the helix. I assume the numbers 441 refers to something as well. What is that something???

If anyone has anything has anything else to add, please do.
 
Bringing this to the top for ya. I know there ismore potential in the ramps. But they seem to be neglected, forgotten or just plane mis understood. Your analogy is what I understand as well. But, when/how would we use/adjust ramps for a tuning aid? They are not cheap either. $30ea need 3. not something ya want to just grab half a doz different ones and play with them.
 
"There's been a lot of talk recently regarding BRP's switch in the '09 Summits from the 42 helix to the 43/47 in the secondary yet very little about the switch to a 413 ramp to the 441 in the primary. I'm hoping this thread will get the discussion started.

I still have a lot to learn regarding clutching, though I've learned a lot in the last couple years. The one thing that I haven't found much info on is ramp angles.

As a refresher for those that don't know, the TRA primary has three arms that swing outwards as RPM increases and swing back inwards as RPM decreases. They swing on a path guided by three ramps. These ramps are attached to the moveable sheeve of the primary clutch. As the arms swing outward they slide along the ramps and in doing so close the primary. The more the primary closes, the greater the effective 'gear ratio' of the drive 'sprocket'. .."


That is also a very good description of how the Polar works as well. But there is no need to play with the ramps after you bolt them in. The only adjustment is the weight, no springs, no angles of curves adjusting, nothing. This probably a good thing as people are playing around too much and missing some good riding time.

As for the ramp numbers relating to helix angles, I don't think so. Some of those ramps have been around along time on smaller HP engines that could not drive those helix numbers.
 
i don't think he is trying to find out what ramp number relates to what helix number but what the ramp numbers are referring to? is a 441 or 413 measuring the curves or profile of the ramp or is it just an identification number for each?
 
i don't think he is trying to find out what ramp number relates to what helix number but what the ramp numbers are referring to? is a 441 or 413 measuring the curves or profile of the ramp or is it just an identification number for each?


ya, I allready know the hundreds series number is what Model TRA they were designed with
1XX = TRA 1 the original
2XX = TRA II
3XX = TRA III
4XX + Well they seemed to jump from the IV up to the VII series TRA and still keeping with the 4XX designation

All 1XX-3XX series will interchange with the 3 series TRA's, its the 4XX series that are different
 
I have watched a guy tune on ramps for years.... I findly figured it out....

VOODOO
 
i will add my two cents in here, as im still working on clutching my 1000 a tad better, and trying to get something that works pretty good.

as far as ramps go, i think they can be adjusted to meet the clutching needs of an engine, say an engine that runs twins and can barely idle at 2000rpm should have a shallow angle to start and then ramp up, allowing the motor to wind up and get going, same idea for a turbo style sled, needs a chance to get the RPM, then it can pull really hard. my sled, the rt 1000 has an amazing bottom end, and a top end to match, so the idea, in my mind would be to have a slightly more aggressive angle lower in the ramp, as the motor can turn things better down low, basically using all the power the motor has to offer per location on the ramp....

**DISCLAIMER** i am NO TRA master whatsoever, just adding some ideas that that made sense to me, please feel free to correct me. DON'T go adjust your clutching according to my theory or you may make your 800 run like a 550 fan.
 
There's been a lot of talk recently regarding BRP's switch in the '09 Summits from the 42 helix to the 43/47 in the secondary yet very little about the switch to a 413 ramp to the 441 in the primary. I'm hoping this thread will get the discussion started.

I still have a lot to learn regarding clutching, though I've learned a lot in the last couple years. The one thing that I haven't found much info on is ramp angles.

As a refresher for those that don't know, the TRA primary has three arms that swing outwards as RPM increases and swing back inwards as RPM decreases. They swing on a path guided by three ramps. These ramps are attached to the moveable sheeve of the primary clutch. As the arms swing outward they slide along the ramps and in doing so close the primary. The more the primary closes, the greater the effective 'gear ratio' of the drive 'sprocket'.

s the belt is pinched by the primary clutch it forces itself further down in the secondary clutch. This also further increase the effective 'gear ratio' of the system. (Think of shifting up or down in gears on your 10 speed.) As the secondary turns it does not directly drive the track through the chaincase and axle. The helix distributes the amount of load provided by the secondary to the jackshaft faster or slower depending on its angle. The steeper the angle (44,45,46,47,etc...) the faster the helix transfers load the between the jackshaft and the secondary. The shallower the angle (42,41,40, etc...) the slower the load is transfered.


Back to ramps;

It is the curvature of the ramp that adjusts the timing and the degree to which the movable sheeve of the primary slides in and out at a given RPM.


Here's where I'm a little uncertain (If you have something to add or change to this description, please do):

I believe that the more aggressive the curvature of the ramp is, the faster the clutch will close and therefore, the faster the primary will shift. This, of course, depends on the load that will be placed on the primary (and therefore the engine) by the track through the secondary clutch.

- If the curvature of the ramp is too aggressive relative to the power of the engine, the engine will bog and your sled will accelerate slower.

- If the curvature of the ramp is not aggressive enough relative to the power of the engine, the sled will not accelerate as quickly as it could as the engine isn't working as hard as it possibly could.

This leads to what I beleive to be a clutching law : The more powerful your engine, the more aggressive the ramps in your clutch can be.

Correct????



One more question: There is clearly a difference in a 413 ramp compared to a 441 to a ______. With a helix the number that describes the helix refers to the angle (or angles) of the helix. I assume the numbers 441 refers to something as well. What is that something???

If anyone has anything has anything else to add, please do.

By looking at the ramp profiles in the race manual, it starts getting more clear how they will effect performance. You can't generally state anything about the ramp angles as the angles can change from bottom to top. It's at least three points on the ramp that you need to consider and the relationship between. e.g. if the ramp starts really high and then drops deep into a curve, this will make the clutch shift up easily and at lower rpm as the ramp could effectively be going down hill. Now being deep in the curve, if the upper part of the ramp is steep, the engine rpm will tend to be held longer until it can get enough momentum to move farther up this steep section of the ramp. I personally did not like the buzzy feeling of my 800 xp on the trail. It was sitting at near 6000 rpm when I was only going slow. I change to a ramp that started higher and the mid section and the top was the same as the 413. (410 I think it was) This helped the clutch shift up earlier and now at the same track speed, the rpm is near 5000. This was a great improvement for me but the sled may be a little slower off the line. Just look at your ramps and think about your sleds performance and consider at which rpm you would like to make changes, thats where the ramp should differ from yours. IMHO
 
By looking at the ramp profiles in the race manual, it starts getting more clear how they will effect performance. You can't generally state anything about the ramp angles as the angles can change from bottom to top. It's at least three points on the ramp that you need to consider and the relationship between. e.g. if the ramp starts really high and then drops deep into a curve, this will make the clutch shift up easily and at lower rpm as the ramp could effectively be going down hill. Now being deep in the curve, if the upper part of the ramp is steep, the engine rpm will tend to be held longer until it can get enough momentum to move farther up this steep section of the ramp. I personally did not like the buzzy feeling of my 800 xp on the trail. It was sitting at near 6000 rpm when I was only going slow. I change to a ramp that started higher and the mid section and the top was the same as the 413. (410 I think it was) This helped the clutch shift up earlier and now at the same track speed, the rpm is near 5000. This was a great improvement for me but the sled may be a little slower off the line. Just look at your ramps and think about your sleds performance and consider at which rpm you would like to make changes, thats where the ramp should differ from yours. IMHO



Thanks TA.

I like your thinking and picturing the ramp that way makes a lot of sense. I'm going to have to do some major 'seat of your pants' tuning to get this right I think.



.
 
The farther the roller away from the crankshaft centerline, the harder the TRA lever will push.
When you lower the clicker, this allows the TRA roller to be at a position farther away from the crankshaft centerline. (Lever pushes harder = less or sluggish rpms)
When you raise the clicker, this reduces the distance of the roller from the crankshaft centerline. (lever pushes less hard = more or quicker rpms)

At the end of the ramps you see where a fictional roller position is. The 413 on top is closer to the crankshaft centerline and will create more rpms than the roller position on the 441 ramp.

The starting angles 413 (Roller start) More ramp angle will create higher rpms at engagment. Will create higher rpms under sustained throttle positions.
The starting angles 441 (Roller start) has less ramp angle than the 413 ramp. The 441 will create slight lower rpms at engagment (on paper). Will lower higher rpms under sustained throttle positions.

343605782.jpg
 
Last edited:
Whoa! When you answer a question, you answer a question. Thanks for all the effort Joe!! It's appreciated.




.
 
The new website I am working on having all ramps, every ramp known out in oem and aftermarket land....you'll be able to pick a ramp and lay it on top of each other. The ramps will be in different color outlines and have references to show how a ramp can;
Push harder
Quicker rpms
Roller dwell ranges.

I can't wait to have that up, it should be up before xmas time.

343678971.jpg


The difficult part taking a long time is to have all the ramps scanned correctly and then program the numbers to come up in different colors and not have them lay on top of each other.
Then other logistic problems are "are the outlines too thick?" and "How many ramps can be laid upon each other?" and then "printing options?"
.....waaaAAAaay more to this than I ever expected, I can't believe how much $$$$ this kind of programming takes at $85/hour - I hope it pays off for me.

Then next is to have "Ramps in Clicker positions" so you'll be able to pick a ramp and set it in a clicker position you like and compare it to other ramps in other clicker positions - this is waaaay off the rails of expensive script programming but Im having so much fun doing it.

Im hoping for being able to do this as an example...

Choose a ramp.
Choose a clicker the ramp will be used in.

Choose another ramp
Choose the clicker that ramp will be used in

Overlay on top of each other
Decide which one will suit an application better IF you are having rpm problems.
OR
If you want to grind a ramp, what shape will you pick to grind?
 
Last edited:
The new website I am working on having all ramps, every ramp known out in oem and aftermarket land....you'll be able to pick a ramp and lay it on top of each other. The ramps will be in different color outlines and have references to show how a ramp can;
Push harder
Quicker rpms
Roller dwell ranges.

I can't wait to have that up, it should be up before xmas time.

343678971.jpg


The difficult part taking a long time is to have all the ramps scanned correctly and then program the numbers to come up in different colors and not have them lay on top of each other.
Then other logistic problems are "are the outlines too thick?" and "How many ramps can be laid upon each other?" and then "printing options?"
.....waaaAAAaay more to this than I ever expected, I can't believe how much $$$$ this kind of programming takes at $85/hour - I hope it pays off for me.

Then next is to have "Ramps in Clicker positions" so you'll be able to pick a ramp and set it in a clicker position you like and compare it to other ramps in other clicker positions - this is waaaay off the rails of expensive script programming but Im having so much fun doing it.

Im hoping for being able to do this as an example...

Choose a ramp.
Choose a clicker the ramp will be used in.

Choose another ramp
Choose the clicker that ramp will be used in

Overlay on top of each other
Decide which one will suit an application better IF you are having rpm problems.
OR
If you want to grind a ramp, what shape will you pick to grind?


WOW! That sounds amazing Joe. Something like that would be a quantum leap forward in clutch tuning. Thanks for all your work.


.
 
i kinda went overboard with an answer but i could not help myself, im pretty excited about the website and the features that are on it.
Gear calculator for any drive system you can dream up of
Ramp profile viewer
FORUM - restricted to Clutching.
 
Joe i'll even give you props for the diagrams....

An easy way to look at ramps is it's harder to walk ( TRAroller) up a steep hill. The steep ramp slows the roller keeping it in lower ratios which will keep engine rpm higher .....It is easier to walk ( TRA roller) up a flatter hill giving you faster shift to higher ratios but will also lower engine rpm.

When you baseline your setup always baseline in clicker #1 so you have the full range of use from your clickers as needed.

OT
 
Premium Features



Back
Top